ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* vertical square root upstroke (instead of having a slant)
@ 2013-12-01 19:57 Sanjoy Mahajan
  2013-12-02 11:30 ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sanjoy Mahajan @ 2013-12-01 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context

With the following minimal file on MkIV (2013.05.28 00:36 MKIV current),
the upstroke of the square root is vertical instead of having the usual
slant toward the right.  With MkII it has the usual slant.

I see this problem only with certain arrangements of variables (that
recur often in my book chapter on springs and piano strings).  For
example, it goes away after changing the "\rho" to a "b".

\starttext
\startformula
\sqrt{Tb^2\over \rho}.
\stopformula
\stoptext

I know that the big math symbols are constructed differently in MkIV
and MkII.  Does the example above show an intended difference?

-- 
-Sanjoy
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: vertical square root upstroke (instead of having a slant)
  2013-12-01 19:57 vertical square root upstroke (instead of having a slant) Sanjoy Mahajan
@ 2013-12-02 11:30 ` Hans Hagen
  2013-12-03 15:41   ` Sanjoy Mahajan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2013-12-02 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

On 12/1/2013 8:57 PM, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
> With the following minimal file on MkIV (2013.05.28 00:36 MKIV current),
> the upstroke of the square root is vertical instead of having the usual
> slant toward the right.  With MkII it has the usual slant.
>
> I see this problem only with certain arrangements of variables (that
> recur often in my book chapter on springs and piano strings).  For
> example, it goes away after changing the "\rho" to a "b".
>
> \starttext
> \startformula
> \sqrt{Tb^2\over \rho}.
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
>
> I know that the big math symbols are constructed differently in MkIV
> and MkII.  Does the example above show an intended difference?

a radical has a couple of increasing sizes (discrete steps, if they have 
a slant depends of the font designer) before it switches to an 
extensible that then normally has no slant

(in context one can hook in a mp variant that keeps the slant)

(if needed we can make it an option to omit steps and always use upright)

Hans


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: vertical square root upstroke (instead of having a slant)
  2013-12-02 11:30 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2013-12-03 15:41   ` Sanjoy Mahajan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sanjoy Mahajan @ 2013-12-03 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hans Hagen, mailing list for ConTeXt users

> a radical has a couple of increasing sizes (discrete steps, if they
> have a slant depends of the font designer) before it switches to an
> extensible that then normally has no slant

Interesting.  That explains the difference:  The \rho made the radical
big enough to switch to the extensible, unslanted version.

> (in context one can hook in a mp variant that keeps the slant)
> (if needed we can make it an option to omit steps and always use upright)

My math-typography sense is far from developed, and mostly comes from
having read lots of math books.  With that caveat, my gut feelings are
that (1) the switch from slant to upright is a bit surprising for a
reader, and (2) that the slant version is more common, so an
always-upright radical would also be a bit surprising.

But perhaps you or others with a more developed typographical eye have a
more principled way of judging?

-Sanjoy
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-03 15:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-01 19:57 vertical square root upstroke (instead of having a slant) Sanjoy Mahajan
2013-12-02 11:30 ` Hans Hagen
2013-12-03 15:41   ` Sanjoy Mahajan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).