From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/11493 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Patrick Gundlach Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: 8r vs. ec vs. texnansi Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 23:39:15 +0100 Organization: privat Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <87wuiwti3w.fsf_-_@gundla.ch> References: <20030220163139.GA25234@idi.ntnu.no> <5.1.0.14.0.20030220182954.0234dfc0@server-1> <20030318131323.GB12151@idi.ntnu.no> <87el54vhdz.fsf@gundla.ch> <20030318184827.1399fd6e.morawski@gmx.net> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1048027336 9739 80.91.224.249 (18 Mar 2003 22:42:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Tue Mar 18 23:42:14 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18vPmf-0002Wo-00 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 23:42:13 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024BA10B51; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 23:42:13 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.189]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149F110B4B for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 23:39:33 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18vPk5-0003sW-00 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 23:39:33 +0100 Original-Received: from [129.217.137.68] (helo=levana) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18vPk5-00059r-00 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 23:39:33 +0100 Original-Received: from pg by levana with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18vPjn-0001PH-00 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 23:39:15 +0100 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Lieblings-Musik: a.c. In-Reply-To: <20030318184827.1399fd6e.morawski@gmx.net> (Jens-Uwe Morawski's message of "Tue, 18 Mar 2003 18:48:27 +0100") Original-Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i586-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:11493 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:11493 Jens-Uwe Morawski writes: Hello Jens and others, >> \setupencoding[default=8r] > > what is the advantage of using 8r instead of ec or texnansi? It is a matter of taste and the characters you need. There is no big difference for my german and english texts. texnansi does not work with the preinstalled (psnfss) fonts from teTeX. So this leaves my preferred coding system to 8r or ec. Sometimes I need glyphs that are encoded in 8r but not in ec (euro sign for example). I never use glyphs that are encoded in ec but not in 8r. Patrick