From: Jonas Baggett <jonas17b@gmail.com>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: Ideas for improving documentation of ConTeXt
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:18:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bb2c8ab-c266-8a8e-f19a-64069442069a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <837405983.265372955.1476119068519.JavaMail.root@spooler6-g27.priv.proxad.net>
Hello Jean-Pierre,
Le 10.10.16 à 19:04, Jean-Pierre Delange a écrit :
> A simple question : is it usefull to get a very quick access to a documentation where explanation is absent ? That's why the current explanation is very useful : even if you have to read full pages at length, the explanation given in the PDF documentation is an accurate information and oftenly says something which allow to lead to a solve your issue. So, it seems there is a conflict between the desire of a quick access to relevant information and the need of learning ConTeXt with patience !
Actually we can have the advantage of both. When someone is accessing an
example that has e.g. the tags "table" and "luatex", then links to the
pdf and wiki documentation about tables and luatex could be shown aside.
And thanks for pointing that ! I would not have think about that otherwise.
And your wiki is something I should definitively have a look at. Thanks
for the work !
Cheers,
Jonas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-12 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-09 11:18 Jonas Baggett
2016-10-09 13:49 ` Yi Qingliang
2016-10-10 5:21 ` Jonas Baggett
2016-10-09 19:31 ` Henri Menke
2016-10-09 22:49 ` Jonas Baggett
2016-10-10 7:35 ` Hans Hagen
2016-10-11 21:36 ` Jonas Baggett
2016-10-09 20:51 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2016-10-10 5:43 ` Jonas Baggett
2016-10-10 7:24 ` Hans Hagen
2016-10-11 21:05 ` Jonas Baggett
2016-10-12 11:30 ` Jonas Baggett
2016-10-12 15:29 ` Yi Qingliang
2016-10-12 15:33 ` Mica Semrick
2016-10-12 17:32 ` Jonas Baggett
2016-10-12 17:45 ` Bomber K.
2016-10-12 17:55 ` Bomber K.
2016-10-10 7:57 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2016-10-10 17:04 ` Jean-Pierre Delange
2016-10-10 17:34 ` Hans Hagen
2016-10-10 21:41 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2016-10-11 5:20 ` Jean-Pierre Delange
2016-10-12 21:18 ` Jonas Baggett [this message]
2016-10-12 10:17 ` Jonas Baggett
2016-10-10 5:32 ` Aditya Mahajan
2016-10-10 5:43 ` Aditya Mahajan
2016-10-11 20:26 ` Jonas Baggett
2016-10-11 20:40 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2016-10-12 21:27 ` Jonas Baggett
2016-10-13 8:15 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2016-10-13 9:23 ` Aditya Mahajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bb2c8ab-c266-8a8e-f19a-64069442069a@gmail.com \
--to=jonas17b@gmail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).