From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, URIBL_SBL_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 4708 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2023 16:37:13 -0000 Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (5.39.185.202) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 28 Sep 2023 16:37:13 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA2C4831F6 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 18:36:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lte5cWo4oRVv for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 18:36:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4934832B7 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 18:34:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF6F4831C9 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 18:34:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id viHxe3YRbwzV for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 18:34:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orford.cim.mcgill.ca (orford.cim.mcgill.ca [132.206.70.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C98E04831C8 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 18:34:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from adi-carbonpad (lfbn-idf1-1-1685-151.w90-91.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.91.116.151]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: adityam) by orford.cim.mcgill.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8E1F30F957 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 12:34:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 18:34:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Aditya Mahajan To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Message-ID: <8r59719p-7rpo-4rq0-5ooq-7260s1s92o4q@hzvpu.rqh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: 5LKQGIJGRIGKX46Y7GWEJ2EPYAD7A2KF X-Message-ID-Hash: 5LKQGIJGRIGKX46Y7GWEJ2EPYAD7A2KF X-MailFrom: adityam@umich.edu X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.8 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Subject: [NTG-context] formula alignment for mathalign List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, The `align` parameter of `\setupformulas` is ignored in mathalign. Consider the following MWE: \setupformulas[align=flushleft,leftmargin=2em] \starttext \startformula A = B \stopformula vs \startformula \startalign \NC A \NC B \NR \NC A \NC B \NR \stopalign \stopformula \stoptext The first display formula is flush left, but the aligned formula is centered on the page. This appears to be a regression compared to MkIV, where the above example works correctly. Aditya ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________