From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9656 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[6]: Gamma support in TeXExec? Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:13:53 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl Message-ID: <90610107.20021026091353@iol.it> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20021021085206.02ecf2a8@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021020184536.00afa6e0@remote-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021020184536.00afa6e0@remote-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021021085206.02ecf2a8@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021022101312.02d88548@server-1> <10298650241.20021022113335@iol.it> <87lm4nn5oz.fsf@infovore.xs4all.nl> <190601835.20021025085442@iol.it> <877kg6l7r6.fsf@infovore.xs4all.nl> Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035616817 19698 80.91.224.249 (26 Oct 2002 07:20:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 07:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Return-path: Original-Received: from [131.211.172.13] (helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 185LEz-000576-00 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:20:13 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6526010ADF; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:21:19 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from smtp1.libero.it (smtp1.libero.it [193.70.192.51]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D60C10ADF for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:20:16 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from [151.29.129.230] (151.29.129.230) by smtp1.libero.it (6.5.028) id 3DB940C700059E72; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:16:28 +0200 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60q) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Original-To: Olaf Weber In-Reply-To: <877kg6l7r6.fsf@infovore.xs4all.nl> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9656 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9656 Friday, October 25, 2002 Olaf Weber wrote: >> Are there Omega implementations for DOS? OW> Last time I checked, it compiled successfully using djgpp. Actually, OW> Eli Zaretskii spent a lot of time making the web2c stuff configure and OW> compile cleanly under djgpp. While some of the supporting files have OW> not been updated recently, getting it to compile again should be OW> comparatively easy. OW> It simply truncates extensions to three characters. In this case these such implementations could "system-dependently" change the format extension (instead of truncating, removing the "m", for example). >> I mean, I think we should stop worrying about this. If an DOS >> implementation is indeed done, they can change it with no big >> problems. OW> IIRC, ISO CDOM format also privileges .3 filenames; look at the OW> various compatibility levels. Hm. I'm starting to think that Hans Hagen idea to put each format under a separate subfolder of the \fmt directory is not that bad ... could be pass the suggestion on to the TDS committee? -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta