From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/36209 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steffen Wolfrum Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: new upload Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:10:21 +0200 Message-ID: <90C94CBF-38ED-4979-8D56-3667E9D0005D@st.estfiles.de> References: <46CECE96.2060301@wxs.nl> <46CF1142.9070300@wxs.nl> <28EBF59A-54F4-48BC-B3BD-70359F77DB85@st.estfiles.de> <46D187D0.9010708@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188155499 11528 80.91.229.12 (26 Aug 2007 19:11:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:11:39 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Aug 26 21:11:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IPNWG-0001cG-4b for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:11:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F45F20337; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:11:30 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32601-02-6; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:11:17 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9046202AD; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:11:16 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232A4202AD for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:11:14 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32601-02-5 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:11:06 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.44]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB07201F7 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:11:06 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 29371 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2007 19:11:05 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.4]) (698580@[84.188.233.172]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Aug 2007 19:11:05 -0000 In-Reply-To: <46D187D0.9010708@wxs.nl> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:36209 Archived-At: Am 26.08.2007 um 16:01 schrieb Hans Hagen: >> >> Does this also cover the following: The Problem of a word with |\-| >> moving at the and of a line and thus loosing the hyphen (see below). > > \- is meant to work that way -) > > try |-| > > Hans That doesn't help here. I meant those trick situations which were discussed in that thread = below: > Von: Hans Hagen > Datum: 20. M=E4rz 2007 07:24:20 MEZ > An: mailing list for ConTeXt users > Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] broken: noligature AND hyphenation > Antwort an: mailing list for ConTeXt users > > Steffen Wolfrum wrote: >> Just for the records: >> >> One has to be careful with this kind of avoiding ligatures. >> In most cases it works perfect, but when the word moves towards = >> the end of the line and should be broken >> then the hyphen misses! >> >> But I guess there is no solution that fits *both* situations: = >> regularly on a line and cross lines? >> > not yet, luatex will be more clever > > Hans Is Mark IV already that clever? Mark II wasn't. Run the following test please. \starttext \showframe \switchtobodyfont[rm,24pt] test test test test test test test test Auflage Auflage% ligature is = wrong here test test test test test test test test Auf|\-|lage Auf|\-|lage% no- = ligature is right, but missing at the line end test test test test test test test test Auf|-|lage Auf|-|lage% right = behaviour at the line end, but a mess otherwise \stoptext What should be done? Steffen ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________