ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Otared Kavian <otared@gmail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Differences for \Vert in mkii and mkiv
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:04:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <91C8082E-FAD3-4E24-B856-F7D3A45C7FE1@gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 842 bytes --]

Dear Aditya, dear Hans,

I noticed a serious difference between what one gets for \left\Vert in mkii and in mkiv.
Probably this is due to the fact that in mkiv the glyph for \Vert is constructed in a different manner, but as far as I know from what I see in the mathematical printed materials, the correct one, or the expected one, is the output from mkii.
I join two small PDF files obtained with the typesetting of the following minimal example:

%%% begin test-Vert.tex
\let\|=\Vert
\starttext
Look at the differences between mkii output and that with mkiv:
\startformula
\left\Vert\int_0^1 G(\cdot,s)ds\right \|_{L^q} \lesssim \|G\|_{L^p}.
\stopformula


\stoptext

%%% end test-Vert.tex

Is there a way to redefine locally \Vert (or \|) so that in mkiv one gets the same output as with mkii?

Thanks in advance: OK

[-- Attachment #2: Vert-mkii.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 70053 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 1 bytes --]



[-- Attachment #4: Vert-mkiv.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 29741 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #5: Type: text/plain, Size: 2 bytes --]




[-- Attachment #6: Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

             reply	other threads:[~2011-01-18 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-18 15:04 Otared Kavian [this message]
2011-01-19 16:44 ` Aditya Mahajan
2011-02-02  9:12   ` Otared Kavian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=91C8082E-FAD3-4E24-B856-F7D3A45C7FE1@gmail.com \
    --to=otared@gmail.com \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).