From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/11985 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[4]: Backgrounds Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 16:41:46 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <9211962130.20030418164146@iol.it> References: <5.2.0.9.1.20030410215807.014f3880@localhost> <871y0biuyd.fsf@gundla.ch> <5.1.0.14.1.20030325094633.031a8c80@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20030325094633.031a8c80@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20030325131938.01d9af40@server-1> <9619582618.20030325153623@iol.it> <871y0biuyd.fsf@gundla.ch> <5.2.0.9.1.20030410215807.014f3880@localhost> <5.2.0.9.1.20030411180118.016c46e8@server-1> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1050677074 9875 80.91.224.249 (18 Apr 2003 14:44:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Fri Apr 18 16:44:32 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 196X6O-0002Z6-00 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 16:44:32 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328B210AE7; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 16:45:18 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from smtp1.libero.it (smtp1.libero.it [193.70.192.51]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2605210AEC for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 16:41:53 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from [151.29.140.215] (151.29.140.215) by smtp1.libero.it (7.0.012) id 3E954686002FB2D6 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 16:41:52 +0200 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.63 Beta/7) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.1.20030411180118.016c46e8@server-1> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:11985 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:11985 Friday, April 11, 2003 Hans Hagen wrote: HH> At 15:35 11/04/2003 +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >>I think I see; instead of drawing only the needed parts you draw >>the whole frame and then cut the unwanted parts off. Is this more >>efficient than drawing only the needed parts? HH> simplier, less error prone, less code, more educative ... Oh, BTW Hans, there are some visual differences between your code and my code, which one notices as soon as the pen is changed (try for example drawing your frames with a pen which is a pensquare rotated 45). Any news on the split boolean? :) -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta