From: "Jan Tosovsky" <j.tosovsky@email.cz>
To: "'mailing list for ConTeXt users'" <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: interaction strangeness
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 20:55:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9520.61298671669$1386532555@news.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BFA2C8F9-EA6D-4109-8C5E-8D1ABC391DF2@uva.nl>
On 2013-12-06 H. van der Meer wrote:
> Some further experimentation: interchanging two chapters makes the
> problem go away.
>
> It is reproducible, because putting the chapters back als brings the
> problem back. Even stranger, sitting at chapter 5 it kills the
> interaction for chapter 6 and 8, leaving the interactivity for the
> intervening and later chapters intact.
>
> Addition of content to the start of chapter 5 helped for chapter 6 but
> not for chapter 8, which seems strange.
> Addition of content to the end of chapter 5 also helped for chapter 6
>
> Addition of content to the start of chapter 7 did help to solve for
> chapter 8.
>
> So I fear it has in some way to do with the moment the output routine
> is
> called in relation to the reference processing in
> \startchapter[title=,reference=].
This topic was discussed few weeks ago without clear conclusion:
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2013/075988.html
In my case most of cases were resolved when I changed
\placebookmarks[chapter, section] just to \placebookmarks[chapter]
Although few cases still remain, it is much better now.
When the particular item doesn't react via bookmark, it doesn't react also
via ToC.
I plan to prepare an example for this, but for me it is not so urgent issue.
Jan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-08 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-06 11:42 H. van der Meer
2013-12-06 13:50 ` H. van der Meer
2013-12-06 18:16 ` Alan Braslau
2013-12-08 19:55 ` Jan Tosovsky [this message]
[not found] ` <013101cef44f$703135b0$5093a110$@tosovsky@email.cz>
2013-12-08 20:56 ` Martin Moncrieffe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='9520.61298671669$1386532555@news.gmane.org' \
--to=j.tosovsky@email.cz \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).