From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/37704 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Henning Hraban Ramm" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Greek: GR or EL? Czech: CZ or CS? UK: Ukrainian or ... Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:16:37 +0100 Message-ID: <954f61110712050316p4e7c3c27t92da8df9254b2f0a@mail.gmail.com> References: <6faad9f00712041740k7c485079y88171590235accf4@mail.gmail.com> <115224fb0712050042s1c5f0ffg5ec3e9066d5703f8@mail.gmail.com> <954f61110712050155y3332796fubaf402e4108f8523@mail.gmail.com> <20071205104538.GA3218@phare.normalesup.org> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1900619293==" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1196853504 3247 80.91.229.12 (5 Dec 2007 11:18:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:18:24 +0000 (UTC) To: "Mailing list for ConTeXt users" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Dec 05 12:18:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IzsGs-0006U7-TD for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 12:18:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994D21FB33; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:17:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05848-01-2; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:17:13 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD9A1FB0A; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:17:13 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC3E1FB0A for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:17:12 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04174-02-2 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:16:39 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.186]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4BC1FB01 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:16:38 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k15so3368240rvb for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 03:16:37 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.140.169.4 with SMTP id r4mr1073424rve.1196853397160; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 03:16:37 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.141.34.5 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 03:16:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20071205104538.GA3218@phare.normalesup.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3680fe68904c9182 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:37704 Archived-At: --===============1900619293== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_941_32395975.1196853397134" ------=_Part_941_32395975.1196853397134 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline 2007/12/5, Arthur Reutenauer : > > > No! "deo" ist modern German in old orthography (pre-2005). > > OK, so I guess that's what RFC 4646 suggests de-1996 for -- I suppose > the reform was first introduced in 1996 and adopted only later? See > ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4646.txt, page 13 (Mojca, the > preceding paragraph is for you ;-) > Maybe; we've now the 42th reform of the reform - a lot is back to pre-reform orthography (or both styles are allowed). 2005 was only a estimation - AFAIR in 2005 the reformed orthography became standard for schools and public authorities. Greetlings, Hraban ------=_Part_941_32395975.1196853397134 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
2007/12/5, Arthur Reutenauer <arthur.reutenauer@normalesup.org>:
> No! "deo" ist modern German in old orthography (pre-2005).

  OK, so I guess that's what RFC 4646 suggests de-1996 for -- I suppose
the reform was first introduced in 1996 and adopted only later?  See
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4646.txt, page 13 (Mojca, the
preceding paragraph is for you ;-)

Maybe; we've now the 42th reform of the reform - a lot is back to pre-reform orthography (or both styles are allowed).
2005 was only a estimation - AFAIR in 2005 the reformed orthography became standard for schools and public authorities.

Greetlings, Hraban
------=_Part_941_32395975.1196853397134-- --===============1900619293== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ --===============1900619293==--