From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: integral symbol
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:06:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <968135a1-8877-737d-00b2-406196ff2e48@wxs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACyK-eqHTg=s_v_Pktt2yQ+M04icM6+0AsLkWZJ+hzTY-WaYTw@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/29/2016 12:12 PM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> Thanks for your solution. I created a macro, is it "robust" ?
> Fabrice
>
> \setupmathextensible[integral][rightoffset=-3mu,exact=yes,factor=2]
\unexpanded
> \def\integ#1#2#3{\math{\autointegral{#1}{#2}{#3}\diff x}}
>
> \starttext
> \integ{4}{1}{g(x)}
> \stoptext
>
>
> 2016-12-28 18:40 GMT+01:00 Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl
> <mailto:pragma@wxs.nl>>:
>
> On 12/28/2016 6:14 PM, Alan Braslau wrote:
>
> Hi Hans, Hi list,
>
> This is similar to what we have discussed earlier on this list and
> elsewhere regarding \over vs. \frac. (I agree with Knuth that {a
> \over
> b} is *much* more readable in running source code than
> \frac{a}{b} but
> have resigned myself to use \frac{}{}, as this can be made better
> behaved and gives a much better result.)
>
> Other traditional TeX constructs like \int^a_b have their charm (and
> need to remain supported, just like is \over), but I support
> introducing and encouraging the use of new constructs like your
> example
> below. An alternative syntax (that could co-exist) would be
> admitting
> $\left\int ... \right.$, but I do not know what limitations
> there might
> be with both the (luatex) engine and with ConTeXt.
>
>
> the tricky part there is that int has super and subscripts while
> left / right are different animals ... i looked into this (in the
> engine) and decided to delay implementing that (i might do it some
> day but it's sort of tricky to keep compatibility)
>
> also, ints are upright (extensible or stepwise sizes) or slanted
> (stepwise sizes) so even if we support something there are some
> limitations due to lack of font support (could be dealt with in due
> time)
>
> The problem with extensions, like always, in straying from
> traditional
> TeX is interchangeability of code, or, more importantly, in the
> learning curve obstacles that this introduces to traditional TeX
> (and
> LaTeX) thinking. I know that at some level we do not care, for
> we often
> make (good) design choices that improve the syntax of ConTeXt.
>
> Perhaps we can use this thread to discuss other cases (like
> \sum, ...)
> that present difficulties and then decide on good solutions.
>
>
> sure ...
>
> Hans
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
> Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
> tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl
> <http://www.pragma-ade.nl> | www.pragma-pod.nl
> <http://www.pragma-pod.nl>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
> entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl> /
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> <https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/>
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-29 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-28 10:39 Fabrice Couvreur
2016-12-28 11:19 ` Henri Menke
2016-12-28 13:02 ` Fabrice Couvreur
2016-12-28 16:42 ` Hans Hagen
2016-12-28 17:14 ` Alan Braslau
2016-12-28 17:40 ` Hans Hagen
2016-12-29 11:12 ` Fabrice Couvreur
2016-12-29 12:06 ` Hans Hagen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=968135a1-8877-737d-00b2-406196ff2e48@wxs.nl \
--to=pragma@wxs.nl \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).