* 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness
@ 2009-06-10 9:47 Nicolas Girard
2009-06-10 10:08 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Girard @ 2009-06-10 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hi,
i'm a little bit puzzled by the results of the following test file,
using the 3SIDE imposition schema from Willi (
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Imposition#Additional_schemas ).
The results consists in pages 1|2|3 on the recto of the sheet, and
pages 4|5|6 on the verso.
* Is it really the intended result ?
* If so, I don't understand how can \dosetuparrangement{3}{1}{6}{4}{2}
give 1|2|3 // 4|5|6 . What's the rationale ? Why no page 5 among the
arguments of \dosetuparrangement ?
* What if one wants to fold the resulting brochure ? How to adapt the
code (besides by try and error) for the resulting arrangement to be
3|6|1 // 2|4|5 ?
Thanks in advance,
cheers,
Nicolas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness
2009-06-10 9:47 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness Nicolas Girard
@ 2009-06-10 10:08 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2009-06-10 11:21 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-06-10 21:23 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Henning Hraban Ramm @ 2009-06-10 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Am 2009-06-10 um 11:47 schrieb Nicolas Girard:
> The results consists in pages 1|2|3 on the recto of the sheet, and
> pages 4|5|6 on the verso.
>
> * Is it really the intended result ?
Yes. This schema is only for paper-saving; as I wrote in the wiki, I
wanted to print 3 small planner pages on one A4 page.
Sorry, can't help you with the code.
Greetlings from Lake Constance!
Hraban
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness
2009-06-10 9:47 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness Nicolas Girard
2009-06-10 10:08 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
@ 2009-06-10 11:21 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-06-10 12:53 ` Nicolas Girard
2009-06-10 21:23 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2009-06-10 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User:Wolfgang_Schuster#Brochures
Wolfgang
Am 10.06.2009 um 11:47 schrieb Nicolas Girard:
> Hi,
> i'm a little bit puzzled by the results of the following test file,
> using the 3SIDE imposition schema from Willi (
> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Imposition#Additional_schemas ).
> The results consists in pages 1|2|3 on the recto of the sheet, and
> pages 4|5|6 on the verso.
>
> * Is it really the intended result ?
> * If so, I don't understand how can \dosetuparrangement{3}{1}{6}{4}{2}
> give 1|2|3 // 4|5|6 . What's the rationale ? Why no page 5 among the
> arguments of \dosetuparrangement ?
> * What if one wants to fold the resulting brochure ? How to adapt the
> code (besides by try and error) for the resulting arrangement to be
> 3|6|1 // 2|4|5 ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> cheers,
> Nicolas
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
> entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness
2009-06-10 11:21 ` Wolfgang Schuster
@ 2009-06-10 12:53 ` Nicolas Girard
2009-06-10 21:24 ` Wolfgang Schuster
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Girard @ 2009-06-10 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
2009/6/10 Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>:
> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User:Wolfgang_Schuster#Brochures
>
Hi Wolfgang,
well, it seems quite interesting ! Would you allow me to put your code
in the Imposition page, or could you consider doing so ?
Nevertheless, I couldn't make your code work ; I get:
Fatal error: catcode push/pop mismatch. Fix this!
\wait=
Cheers,
Nicolas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness
2009-06-10 9:47 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness Nicolas Girard
2009-06-10 10:08 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2009-06-10 11:21 ` Wolfgang Schuster
@ 2009-06-10 21:23 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2009-06-10 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Am 10.06.2009 um 11:47 schrieb Nicolas Girard:
> * If so, I don't understand how can \dosetuparrangement{3}{1}{6}{4}{2}
> give 1|2|3 // 4|5|6 . What's the rationale ? Why no page 5 among the
> arguments of \dosetuparrangement ?
The placement of the pages is defined \pusharrangedpageTHREESIDE, the
values
above mean:
• number of columns: 3
• number of rows: 1
• total number of pages: 6 (ConTeXt collects 6 pages and arrange them
before
they are written to the pdf file but in Willi's code 3 had been
enough)
• number of crop marks in x direction: 4 (columns + 1)
• number of crop mark in y direction: 2 (rows + 1)
> * What if one wants to fold the resulting brochure ? How to adapt the
> code (besides by try and error) for the resulting arrangement to be
> 3|6|1 // 2|4|5 ?
The page order in a brochure is 5|6|1 and 2|3|4.
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness
2009-06-10 12:53 ` Nicolas Girard
@ 2009-06-10 21:24 ` Wolfgang Schuster
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2009-06-10 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Am 10.06.2009 um 14:53 schrieb Nicolas Girard:
> Hi Wolfgang,
> well, it seems quite interesting ! Would you allow me to put your code
> in the Imposition page, or could you consider doing so ?
Do as you want.
> Nevertheless, I couldn't make your code work ; I get:
There was a \unprotect missing at the start of the code, I added it.
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-10 21:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-10 9:47 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness Nicolas Girard
2009-06-10 10:08 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2009-06-10 11:21 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-06-10 12:53 ` Nicolas Girard
2009-06-10 21:24 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-06-10 21:23 ` Wolfgang Schuster
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).