Next try,

the compact syntax gives the same weird result:

```
\replaceword[replace][au{ff}asse au{ff}asst]


\setreplacements[replace]


\starttext

auffasste


auffasse

\stoptext

```


I would really like to have correct ligatures. What can I do to help finding the reason for this? (Or is it obvious, and I'm just not seeing it?


Best,

Denis



Am 08.10.2020 um 15:15 schrieb Denis Maier:
Ok,
I've commented the whole nolig-german-wordlist out piece by piece, and it looks like it comes down to this:

```
\replaceword[eka][auffasse][au{ff}asse]
\replaceword[eka][auffasst][au{ff}asst]

\setreplacements[eka]

\starttext
auffasste
auffasse
\stoptext
```

Uncommenting one of the \replacewords makes the wrong replacement disappear.
But I don't see why "auffasste" should trigger an replacement. What is happening here?

Best,
Denis
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________