From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/7016 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[2]: Verbatim modules Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 22:35:10 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <987064792.20020225223510@bigfoot.com> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20020225163148.02c0c2c8@server-1> Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035397513 15765 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:25:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Hans Hagen In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20020225163148.02c0c2c8@server-1> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:7016 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:7016 Monday, February 25, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote: HH> At 01:07 PM 2/21/2002 +0100, Robert F. Beeger wrote: >>There are is a JS and a JV verbatim environment defined in ConTeXt. >>What is the difference between those two. Is it only to make the >>intention clear : If you have some Java-code, use JV to make clear >>that it is Java and not JavaScript. If it is JavaScript use JS. Or is >>there more to it. HH> no, as you deduced, theye're just synonyms And they shouldn't be! I believe JV should be kept for Java ("real" Java). -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta