Hi Hans,

maybe you understand the question mark now, you are part of it. 
Unfortunately, I haven't received a reply to my last e-mail from January 
18.
Maybe only those whose questions are more serious, more interesting or 
whatever will get an answer.

I do not understand what you mean with "as follow up on the keyword 
thread we decided to treat bad values to equivalent to 'no'"! Which 
values are bad in this context?

With the new ConTeXt version, "grid" no longer works for me! Too bad.

Should my attempt to use ConTeXt end here?

Greetings

Am 18.01.24 um 13:06 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
> On 1/18/2024 12:59 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
>> What is going on?
>>
>> Yesterday I got a perfect on-grid-written document!
>> But today, with the newest context-version (20240118) all changed for 
>> the worse.
>
> as follow up on the keyword thread we decided to treat bad values to 
> equivalent to 'no'
>
>> I may not get a reply to this e-mail either!
> ?
>
> Hans
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>        tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________ 
>
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry 
> to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / 
> https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
> webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net 
> (mirror)
> archive  : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
> wiki     : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________ 
>