* \in
@ 2006-08-05 0:44 Renaud AUBIN
2006-08-05 0:48 ` \in David Arnold
2006-08-05 4:10 ` \in Aditya Mahajan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Renaud AUBIN @ 2006-08-05 0:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 389 bytes --]
Hi all,
Is that possible to setup the \in command to obtain:
- \in[fig:fig_ref] returns figure 1.1
- \in[eq:eq_ref] returns (1.1)
_ \in[sec:sec_ref] returns section 2.1
Up to now I have used:
- \in{figure}[fig:fig_ref]
- \in{(}{)}[eq_eq_ref] (but there is an extra h space just after "(" )
- \in{section}[sec_sec_ref]
Moreover, how could I set the face of the output ?
Cheers,
Renaud
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 746 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: \in
2006-08-05 0:44 \in Renaud AUBIN
@ 2006-08-05 0:48 ` David Arnold
2006-08-05 4:10 ` \in Aditya Mahajan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Arnold @ 2006-08-05 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1079 bytes --]
A partial answer:
\definereferenceformat[infigure][text=Figure]
\definereferenceformat[infigures][text=Figures]
\definereferenceformat[intable][text=Table]
\definereferenceformat[intables][text=Tables]
\definereferenceformat[insection][text=Section]
\definereferenceformat[inequation][left=(,right=),text=equation]
\definereferenceformat[inexample][text=Example]
\definereferenceformat[indefinition][text=Definition]
Then, in \inequation[eq:newton], we see ...
On Aug 4, 2006, at 5:44 PM, Renaud AUBIN wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is that possible to setup the \in command to obtain:
> - \in[fig:fig_ref] returns figure 1.1
> - \in[eq:eq_ref] returns (1.1)
> _ \in[sec:sec_ref] returns section 2.1
>
> Up to now I have used:
> - \in{figure}[fig:fig_ref]
> - \in{(}{)}[eq_eq_ref] (but there is an extra h space just after "(" )
> - \in{section}[sec_sec_ref]
>
> Moreover, how could I set the face of the output ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Renaud
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2053 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: \in
2006-08-05 0:44 \in Renaud AUBIN
2006-08-05 0:48 ` \in David Arnold
@ 2006-08-05 4:10 ` Aditya Mahajan
2006-08-05 11:30 ` \in Peter Münster
2006-08-05 12:20 ` \in Hans van der Meer
1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Mahajan @ 2006-08-05 4:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Renaud AUBIN wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is that possible to setup the \in command to obtain:
> - \in[fig:fig_ref] returns figure 1.1
> - \in[eq:eq_ref] returns (1.1)
> _ \in[sec:sec_ref] returns section 2.1
>
> Up to now I have used:
> - \in{figure}[fig:fig_ref]
> - \in{(}{)}[eq_eq_ref] (but there is an extra h space just after "(" )
> - \in{section}[sec_sec_ref]
Here is a very simple mechanism, I do not take
care of all the bells and whistles [1] of \in.
\def\myin[#1:#2]{
\expandafter\ifx\csname in#1\endcsname\relax
\writestatus{warning}{referenceformat in#1 not defined}
\in[#1:#2]
\else
\csname in#1\endcsname[#1:#2]
\fi}
\definereferenceformat[insec][text=Section]
\starttext
\section[sec:one]{One}
\placeformula[eq:1]\startformula
a = b
\stopformula
What happens in \myin[sec:one] equation \myin[eq:1].
\definereferenceformat[ineq][left=(,right=)]
What happens in \myin[sec:one] equation \myin[eq:1].
\stoptext
[1] Remember that \in is a very complex command. You can use
\in section [sec:one] instead of \in{section}[sec:one] and also do
subnumbering.
> Moreover, how could I set the face of the output ?
I do not know how. You can abuse left, right options to do this, but I
think that there is a better way.
Aditya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: \in
2006-08-05 4:10 ` \in Aditya Mahajan
@ 2006-08-05 11:30 ` Peter Münster
2006-08-05 12:20 ` \in Hans van der Meer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Peter Münster @ 2006-08-05 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> \def\myin[#1:#2]{
> \expandafter\ifx\csname in#1\endcsname\relax
> \writestatus{warning}{referenceformat in#1 not defined}
> \in[#1:#2]
> \else
> \csname in#1\endcsname[#1:#2]
> \fi}
And if you want to suppress unwanted spaces, you can add some "%":
\def\myin[#1:#2]{%
\expandafter\ifx\csname in#1\endcsname\relax
\writestatus{warning}{referenceformat in#1 not defined}%
\in[#1:#2]%
\else
\csname in#1\endcsname[#1:#2]%
\fi}
Cheers, Peter
--
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: \in
2006-08-05 4:10 ` \in Aditya Mahajan
2006-08-05 11:30 ` \in Peter Münster
@ 2006-08-05 12:20 ` Hans van der Meer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hans van der Meer @ 2006-08-05 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Aug 5, 2006, at 6:10, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Renaud AUBIN wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is that possible to setup the \in command to obtain:
>> - \in[fig:fig_ref] returns figure 1.1
>> - \in[eq:eq_ref] returns (1.1)
>> _ \in[sec:sec_ref] returns section 2.1
>>
>> Up to now I have used:
>> - \in{figure}[fig:fig_ref]
>> - \in{(}{)}[eq_eq_ref] (but there is an extra h space just after
>> "(" )
>> - \in{section}[sec_sec_ref]
>
> Here is a very simple mechanism, I do not take
> care of all the bells and whistles [1] of \in.
>
I wrestled with the same problem and solved it by calling
specifically \ineq for equations and programming it as:
% Parenthesized equation references
\definereferenceformat[ineq][left=(,right=)]
Hans van der Meer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: \in
1999-08-25 10:37 ` \in Taco Hoekwater
@ 1999-08-27 11:17 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 1999-08-27 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: darnold, ntg-context
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> >>>>> "David" == David Arnold <darnold@northcoast.com> writes:
>
> David> All, How does one setup \in so that all references are
> David> surrounded with parentheses?
>
> David> For example, \in{equation][euler] ....
>
> David> would be displayed as
>
> David> For example, equation (3) ...
>
> David> Also, one would need to do this selectively, as one my want
> David> a different format for references to equation than figures,
> David> etc.
>
> I have the same problem.
I've put in on my list. A low level addition is needed. Not that
complicated in itself, but I need to do it carefully (shared low level
macros and so).
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: \in
1999-08-24 20:44 \in David Arnold
@ 1999-08-25 10:37 ` Taco Hoekwater
1999-08-27 11:17 ` \in Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Taco Hoekwater @ 1999-08-25 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ntg-context
>>>>> "David" == David Arnold <darnold@northcoast.com> writes:
David> All, How does one setup \in so that all references are
David> surrounded with parentheses?
David> For example, \in{equation][euler] ....
David> would be displayed as
David> For example, equation (3) ...
David> Also, one would need to do this selectively, as one my want
David> a different format for references to equation than figures,
David> etc.
I have the same problem.
Taco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* \in
@ 1999-08-24 20:44 David Arnold
1999-08-25 10:37 ` \in Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Arnold @ 1999-08-24 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
All,
How does one setup \in so that all references are surrounded with parentheses?
For example, \in{equation][euler] ....
would be displayed as
For example, equation (3) ...
Also, one would need to do this selectively, as one my want a different
format for references to equation than figures, etc.
Perhaps define my own reference, something like
\def\eqref#1{\in{equation}[now I'm stuck
Any suggestions?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-05 12:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-05 0:44 \in Renaud AUBIN
2006-08-05 0:48 ` \in David Arnold
2006-08-05 4:10 ` \in Aditya Mahajan
2006-08-05 11:30 ` \in Peter Münster
2006-08-05 12:20 ` \in Hans van der Meer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-08-24 20:44 \in David Arnold
1999-08-25 10:37 ` \in Taco Hoekwater
1999-08-27 11:17 ` \in Hans Hagen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).