From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/77485 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Meer, H. van der" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: italic corrrection? Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 14:09:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <2F7E381B-121F-48D1-B617-B307B3B769F8@uva.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1180836169==" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342879774 22322 80.91.229.3 (21 Jul 2012 14:09:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 14:09:34 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Jul 21 16:09:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SsaN7-0001WL-6Z for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:09:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5011020E; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:09:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6DM2AvfMsJip; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:09:25 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F0E101F3; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:09:25 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5F1101F3 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:09:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id kbZwbQsjV0Hj for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:09:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter3-til.mf.surf.net (filter3-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.219]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F96101EF for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:09:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from HUB02.uva.nl (hub02.uva.nl [146.50.108.231]) by filter3-til.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id q6LE9MSB027373 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:09:23 +0200 Original-Received: from ketelaar.uva.nl ([fe80::cc61:4c73:c438:df97]) by HUB02.uva.nl ([2002:9232:6ce7::9232:6ce7]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:09:22 +0200 Thread-Topic: [NTG-context] italic corrrection? Thread-Index: AQHNZz9BnidJg4P1pU++eLteu8FrnZczkEWAgAANRoCAAAIxAIAABReA In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [82.95.102.36] X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=146.50.108.231; country=NL; region=07; city=Amsterdam; latitude=52.3500; longitude=4.9167; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.3500,4.9167&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 06HB29mbI - ada19844b5e1 - 20120721 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.219 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:77485 Archived-At: --===============1180836169== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A41999CA2DED4F48927DCDF1904720CBuvanl_" --_000_A41999CA2DED4F48927DCDF1904720CBuvanl_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, I see the difference appearing in lucidaot with your example. A pity italic correction isn't available for the n (and some others, I fear= ). It makes {\it n}x{\it n} for n multiplied by n harder in the text, as I = find $n\times n$ within running text to alien looking. That makes {\it n}\,= x{\it n} perhaps the best solution. Hans van der Meer On 21 jul. 2012, at 15:51, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 21.07.2012 um 15:43 schrieb Meer, H. van der: > Add \definefontfeature[default][default][itlc=3Dyes] before \setupbodyfon= t. Thanks but allthough this has an effect on the default modern, it does not = made a difference for lucidaot. Is the TUG delivered lucidaot deficient with respect to the italic correcti= on? It is hard to believe! I goes there is no correction for the =93n=94 but try this example with/wit= hout the =93itlc=94 feature and you can see a difference. \setuppapersize[A6][A6] \definefontfeature[default][default][itlc=3Dyes] \setupbodyfont[lucidaot] \starttext fl f\/l {\it fl f\/l} \stoptext Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.n= l/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ --_000_A41999CA2DED4F48927DCDF1904720CBuvanl_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <2C7424E69EB83645B7226259561731C7@uva.nl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks,
I see the difference appearing in lucidaot with your example.
A pity italic correction isn't available for the n (and some others, I= fear). It makes {\it n}x{\it n} for n multiplied by n harder in the text, = as I find $n\times n$ within running text to alien looking. That makes = ;{\it n}\,x{\it n} perhaps the best solution.

Hans van der Meer



On 21 jul. 2012, at 15:51, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:


Am 21.07.2012 um 15:43 schrieb Meer, H. van der:

> Add \definefontfeature[default][default][itlc= =3Dyes] before \setupbodyfont.
Thanks but allthough this has an effect on the default modern, it does not = made a difference for lucidaot.
Is the TUG delivered lucidaot deficient with respect to the italic correcti= on?
It is hard to believe!

I goes there is no correction for the =93n=94 but try this example wit= h/without the =93itlc=94 feature and you can see a difference.

\setuppapersize[A6][A6]
\definefontfeature[default][default][itlc=3Dyes]
\setupbodyfont[lucidaot]
\starttext
fl f\/l {\it fl f\/l}
\stoptext

Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________= ________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / <= a href=3D"http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context"> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.= nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : = http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://= contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________= ________

--_000_A41999CA2DED4F48927DCDF1904720CBuvanl_-- --===============1180836169== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ --===============1180836169==--