From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/60774 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Blackstone Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Problem with cross references Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 14:22:32 +0200 Message-ID: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281183767 30989 80.91.229.12 (7 Aug 2010 12:22:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 12:22:47 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Aug 07 14:22:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OhiQD-0002rE-Kl for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 14:22:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F418DCA129; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 14:22:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id g13P60e2Y8iU; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 14:22:38 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC1CCA124; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 14:22:38 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0F7CA124 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 14:22:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id aG1ec+8qfsaf for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 14:22:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com (mail-yw0-f41.google.com [209.85.213.41]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5575ACA123 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 14:22:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by ywg8 with SMTP id 8so4010604ywg.14 for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 05:22:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=A9osgSTNFhhiVhGtrV69GNDFYk97PfD0KVRRvU/VFmw=; b=FnvywsoYfG9WD35HdKmYHXyX5U4x0Sc6Z5c5Ld0663S6RCUBAk+jK/J8JVbl+CuJAO DkyNAlb7dYjQ1y9dW4gjfi4jpsaAgjzF40JmW6V+/rUE93s79kDFlEDR/7dpo9hXVNg6 xOyvyckcL4KxFot7naVDt4YA5eNU4fvUDrhfI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=WReg+ZljQZI22e+qRl7NOUzcj+OkJ1CSBZMD0SJHtFPMA8NBlLGAeVjCIxRimt5/zw 7ro17BXPYzyEWzz0GYbtmxaBpE8jToNZYgd6TEOHB2dgC5cto+0xPADb6AG6lQI+hoz8 X3SSEJns106x97EvIGFleWhmzaczw3tzSzpHk= Original-Received: by 10.100.41.9 with SMTP id o9mr15250024ano.240.1281183752347; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 05:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.101.70.7 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 05:22:32 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:60774 Archived-At: Hi all, I would like to get some advice concerning a problem, or rather a nuisance, with internal references. I am making a longish document with several chapters, all of which are separate .tex-files to be input into the main file, which contains all setups and the skeleton of the document. There are a number of cross references between elements that sit in different files. With some simple test files I checked that this worked and that I use the proper commands. However, with the real files it does not work, that is, not immediately. Even after 4 or 5 runs I still get ?? instead of page numbers, and then suddenly things are OK. I have no idea what happened between failure and success and I have no idea what I have to do to get the proper result immediately. It is a nuisance because I cannot be sure the thing worked till I have checked the entire output after each run, which is rather time consuming. I=92m using the latest version of TeXShop with the minimals of july 20, but older versions show the same symptoms. Thanks for any advice. Robert Blackstone ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________