Re: Does Makempy still work?

From: luigi scarso <luigi.scarso@gmail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Does Makempy still work?
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:46:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=7bXh3At1o698DZMftHhK2HrcSheq=AEzt6c77@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin-KD2hb1rHFcr+DeyCGtU2UYnOJNYAP-GBsD7S@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Cedric Mauclair
<cedric.mauclair@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As suggested by Hans, here is an archive with the tex file I used for
> the tests and the resulting "-mpgraph" PDF file (plus all the logs and
> stuff). It looks OK, but when I use "pstoedit -f mpost" (v3.50 with gs
> v8.70), only e, m and c from the formula are in the resulting metapost
> code. I will try with pstoedit v3.45 later today. I use ConTeXt (MkIV)
> from TeXlive 2010 pretest.
>
> If anyone has enough knowledge in gs and PDF files (Luigi?) and
> especially enough time, could you give it a look please? Thanks in
> advance. I will send the PDF to the author of pstoedit too.
#>texexec makempy.tex
works ok under windows 7 and pstoedit 3.50
I've changed scaled 10 with scaled 5

\starttext
\startMPcode
  input mp-grph ;
  graphictext
    "MP $e=mc^2$ MP"
    scaled  5
    withdrawcolor .7blue
    withfillcolor .7white
    withpen pencircle scaled 2pt ;
\stopMPcode
\stoptext

For mkiv, I suspect that gs has some problems with pdfs made by context

-- 
luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________