From: Cecil Westerhof <cldwesterhof@gmail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Does MKIV take more time as MKII
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:47:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=EYi1p2E+fqr3tDTDF3MmLY23eW92p9C3SEv95@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201103141434.58531.alan.braslau@cea.fr>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 827 bytes --]
2011/3/14 Alan BRASLAU <alan.braslau@cea.fr>
> On Monday 14 March 2011 14:02:18 Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> > > 2011/3/14 Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>
> > >
> > >>> I installed the minimals and use MKIV. It seems that it is 1,5 to 2
> > >>> times
> > >>
> > >> as slow as the MKII I used in texlive. Is this possible,
> > >>
> > >> Yes, MkIV is slower.
> > context --silent=\* <filename>
> >
> > speeds up compilation by a factor of 1.5 (but you loose all the logging
> > messages)
> >
>
> or
>
> context --batch <filename>
>
Both did not work for me. But removing --purgeall from my script reduced the
time from 30 seconds to 10.
And because I generate (at the moment) 5 personalised versions, this is a
difference from 2:44 to 0:56.
--
Cecil Westerhof
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1324 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-14 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-14 10:23 Cecil Westerhof
2011-03-14 11:44 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2011-03-14 11:48 ` Cecil Westerhof
2011-03-14 13:02 ` Aditya Mahajan
2011-03-14 13:34 ` Alan BRASLAU
2011-03-14 13:47 ` Cecil Westerhof [this message]
2011-03-14 19:52 ` Mojca Miklavec
2011-03-14 20:22 ` John Haltiwanger
2011-03-15 7:56 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2011-03-16 16:39 ` Hans Hagen
2011-03-16 16:52 ` luigi scarso
2011-03-16 16:59 ` Hans Hagen
2011-03-14 17:54 ` Philipp Gesang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTi=EYi1p2E+fqr3tDTDF3MmLY23eW92p9C3SEv95@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=cldwesterhof@gmail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).