From: luigi scarso <luigi.scarso@gmail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Grammar
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:20:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikH3gH1CiaS0uUF5P=X3XKYKMpcV+z=5uUdRpcW@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C4D5E33.40104@wxs.nl>
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> wrote:
> On 26-7-2010 11:48, John Haltiwanger wrote:
>
>> It seems the most successful/widely adopted form is to vary from 'he'
>> to 'she' (so that in one sentence you use one, in the next another).
>> Some authors even change the gender within a sentence. This method was
>> adopted because 'one' (the "real" correct unisex pronoun) is just too
>> awkward for extended use. The morphographic he/she/he/she method reads
>> surprisingly well.
>
> maybe male authors could use he and female authors could use she
> consistently (or we could get accustomed to 'it')
I try to use "one" and "we" .
--
luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-26 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-24 22:50 Semantic data in ConTeXt? Matija Šuklje
2010-07-25 10:02 ` Hans Hagen
2010-07-25 21:33 ` Matija Šuklje
2010-07-25 21:39 ` Martin Schröder
2010-07-25 21:50 ` Matija Šuklje
2010-07-25 21:41 ` Martin Schröder
2010-07-25 21:50 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2010-07-26 7:13 ` Hans Hagen
2010-07-25 23:47 ` Grammar (was: Semantic data in ConTeXt?) David Rogers
2010-07-26 8:23 ` Matija Šuklje
2010-07-26 9:48 ` John Haltiwanger
2010-07-26 10:06 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-26 10:20 ` luigi scarso [this message]
2010-07-26 11:56 ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-26 12:38 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-26 19:33 ` Grammar Martin Schröder
2010-07-26 20:44 ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 16:53 ` Grammar (was: Semantic data in ConTeXt?) Rory Molinari
2010-07-27 23:12 ` Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-28 0:00 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-28 9:33 ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-28 0:18 ` Grammar (was: Semantic data in ConTeXt?) Rory Molinari
2010-07-28 0:20 ` Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-27 6:10 ` Alan BRASLAU
2010-07-26 16:23 Grammar Richard Stephens
2010-07-26 20:20 ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-26 20:48 ` Grammar Khaled Hosny
2010-07-26 21:25 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-27 8:47 ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-27 13:06 ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-27 13:17 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-27 13:24 ` Grammar luigi scarso
2010-07-27 13:26 ` Grammar Procházka Lukáš
2010-07-27 13:38 ` Grammar Taco Hoekwater
2010-07-27 15:16 ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 15:28 ` Grammar Arthur Reutenauer
2010-07-27 15:38 ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 13:31 ` Grammar Arthur Reutenauer
2010-07-27 14:12 ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-27 15:04 ` Grammar Arthur Reutenauer
2010-07-27 14:10 ` Grammar David Rogers
2010-07-27 14:15 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-27 16:33 ` Grammar David Rogers
2010-07-27 16:59 ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 17:03 ` Grammar Taco Hoekwater
2010-07-27 15:27 ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 17:08 ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-27 23:10 ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-27 23:40 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-28 9:28 ` Grammar Henning Hraban Ramm
2010-07-28 13:14 ` Grammar Alain Delmotte
2010-07-27 22:57 ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-28 5:00 ` Grammar David Rogers
2010-07-28 12:45 ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-28 9:29 ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-28 9:39 ` Grammar Thomas A. Schmitz
2010-07-28 13:00 ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-28 13:12 ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTikH3gH1CiaS0uUF5P=X3XKYKMpcV+z=5uUdRpcW@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=luigi.scarso@gmail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).