On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz
<thomas.schmitz@uni-bonn.de> wrote:
>
> On Dec 23, 2010, at 10:17 PM, Jon Crump wrote:
>
>> My thought, ill-informed perhaps, was simply for clarity: to make it
>> clear that I'm using the same value in both \note[] and \footnote[].
>> In any case, sadly, using what you suggest still gets me the same
>> result.
>
> I get correct output here. Try deleting the doublefoot.tuc file and rerunning ConTeXt.

mysterious: I tried that and got the same output; both for your version and mine

attached .tex and .pdf