From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/58663 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: luigi scarso Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: weird en/em dash behaviour Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 20:43:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100404204906.5fc24a02@vorbis> <4BB8E655.4050607@googlemail.com> <20100404211733.1456892f@vorbis> <4BB9880C.1000900@elvenkind.com> <20100510182959.1f6f3d16@vorbis> <4BE841AC.2030000@wxs.nl> <20100510193449.2f913cef@vorbis> <20100510202522.24c57510@vorbis> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1273517031 5120 80.91.229.12 (10 May 2010 18:43:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 18:43:51 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon May 10 20:43:50 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBXxC-0002Cy-9y for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:43:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5367C9CC8; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:43:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id JaGghsz3IwqJ; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:43:39 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6895C9BC1; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:43:39 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B91C9BC1 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:43:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id pt4qAFVy4GBr for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:43:32 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com (mail-gy0-f169.google.com [209.85.160.169]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE5DC9B80 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:43:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so2177101gyg.14 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:43:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Oycmk1b5xJtaaff6DqwAyzJdQLGg/Lyo0KkspJFo4Qk=; b=tVpkqU81sBOErqluJeWigyeJCImXLoKS1ttljtoxl/+/mMWzm+GI9ppzR5+BR5Y2sf 3Iwl1YhSJX0VzBVZpjZG1ETnoiiyrQKT3ChU4fQi/XlH2pcw41QcgOuhwWHhzb2Ivzw+ IDl6+BM4sMaSFDmOXtneOduvUYc6J0Ql65+4Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=SJr60zJrKv+IOVT/i6UndVWpNpR+gNQQ88Zp/ttcHV8bZsY4zpY0VNCTPy2VaEqOw6 aYIvJ4Mfb3LwrQ6b/R+g8QGAFhxcnzMEck/wmu05gx4SUDPdiNV54xlRsbFf7cDfKrdL xxm3RIFksJi7AINJRFkZdtEJi9NuQMCqFu1gE= Original-Received: by 10.101.143.5 with SMTP id v5mr567026ann.178.1273517010937; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.166.4 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:43:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100510202522.24c57510@vorbis> X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:58663 Archived-At: On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Marco wrote: >> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Marco wrote: >> >> must be something in your system as i see those dashed here >> > I don't think so. I suspect a linux-x86 issue, since the only >> > persons who confirmed this bug were Luigi and Taco, and both run >> > linux-x86 systems. But maybe I'm wrong. I use freshly updated >> > minimals from the garden, so nothing special. >> On my linux box it's now OK with last current > Oh, I see. Can somebody confirm the missing glyphs? My output is > attached. What is wrong in your pdf ? It's like mine, and it's ok. Try to see it with Adobe Reader, or xpdf at least 400% , or just print it -- luigi ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________