ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Curiouslearn <curiouslearn@gmail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Cc: David Rogers <davidandrewrogers@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What are the best fonts to use
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:45:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim+qsfYJ-GAAm4jP7s5uN=yew2D6aqfWPTAHxvi@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110315003147.GC30375@beigebox>

Cecil, thanks for asking this question. Even though the answers
may/will be subjective, it is quite likely that there are people here
who have given some thought to font choice. I agree with previous
responses that reading a book on typography would certainly be
helpful. Nevertheless, I am interested in hearing what fonts people
like (if they do not mind sharing). I, and perhaps some others, may
learn about a few fonts.

Bharat


On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:31 PM, David Rogers
<davidandrewrogers@gmail.com> wrote:
> * Cecil Westerhof <cldwesterhof@gmail.com> [2011-03-14 12:44]:
>
>> At the moment I use for my ebook:
>> \usetypescript[palatino][texnansi]
>> \setupbodyfont[palatino,rm,12pt]
>>
>> Does not look to bad, but layout is not my forte. So if people have tips
>> about the fonts to use, I like to hear them.
>>
>> Do you use other fonts when using a printed book?
>
>
> I don't think this question can have one answer. There are many good
> answers, depending on the kind of book (or other printed material).
>
> 1. I think the layout of the page itself can have a great deal to do
> with whether a certain font looks good (e.g. amount of white space,
> length of lines, etc). Paying proper attention to the "gross" aspects of
> your layout, such as margins and line heights, goes a long way to
> improving the appearance of the whole work, and brings out the best in
> whichever font you choose.
>
> 2. To some extent, different fonts can suit different material (e.g. a
> book of poems vs a financial report, or a textbook vs a novel). For
> extended reading, the conventional wisdom is to choose a
> "normal-looking" font that doesn't call attention to itself too much,
> but obviously you also want one that is at least somewhat attractive to
> look at.
>
> 3. Frankly, giving people what they are already used to is often the
> best plan - probably more often than typographers would care to admit.
> In my opinion, variation for its own sake is over-rated and over-used.
>
> --
> David
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
> the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-16 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-14 11:44 Cecil Westerhof
2011-03-14 22:19 ` Pontus Lurcock
2011-03-15  0:31 ` David Rogers
2011-03-16 11:45   ` Curiouslearn [this message]
2011-03-16 12:50     ` Charles Doherty
2011-03-16 12:59       ` Willi Egger
2011-03-16 13:03         ` Charles Doherty
2011-03-16 13:18         ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2011-03-16 14:02           ` Charles Doherty
2011-03-16 16:51     ` Christian
2011-03-16 18:44       ` Taco Hoekwater
2011-03-16 21:47         ` Christian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTim+qsfYJ-GAAm4jP7s5uN=yew2D6aqfWPTAHxvi@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=curiouslearn@gmail.com \
    --cc=davidandrewrogers@gmail.com \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).