So many things I am only vaguely aware of....!

But I think that pixels are 
a) undocumented 
b) work....

And I'm pretty sure i'll put both (ignorant) feet in it in trying to add something to the Wiki...

Greetings from the grey England..
Ian


On 24 February 2011 13:32, Henning Hraban Ramm <hraban@fiee.net> wrote:

Am 2011-02-24 um 11:34 schrieb Marco:


On 2011-02-24 Ian Lawrence <physics.rooted@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks for taking the trouble for what was really simple, but seems
undocumented (?)

Some other units:
 mm  Millimetres
 cm  Centimetres
 in  Inches
 em  em width, depends on the font
 ex  ex height, depends on the font
 pc  Picas (1pc = 12pt)
 pt  Points (1in = 72.27pt)


There’s also bp (big points). We have the difference between TeX points (pt) and PostScript points (bp) in ConTeXt like in every other TeX:
1 pt = 1/72,27 in = 0,3515 mm (traditional American printer’s point)
1 bp = 1/72 in = 0,3528 mm (after the Anglo-Saxon compromise inch of 1959 = 25.4 mm)
(1 "Didot" point, traditionally used in Europe, was 0,376 mm)

See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_(typography)

Greetlings from Lake Constance!
Hraban
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)


___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________