Issues with number of formula

Issues with number of formula

[views63]

Hi all

I found an issues with number of formula in latest beta (MkIV)

example：

\setupenumerations
[formula]
[way=bysection,
 prefix=yes,
 prefixsegments=chapter:section]
\starttext
\chapter{one}
\section{one}
See formula \in[eq:3]
\section{two}
\placeformula[eq:3]
\startformula
   f(x)=x^3
\stopformula
\stoptext

1. missing a dot in the  number of formula.

I must add "\defineenumeration[definition][text=Definition]"
change"\setupenumerations[definition,formula][...]"
and use once

 \startdefinition
some text
\stopdefinition

before the "\placeformula"

2. in cross-reference,it was missing the section number the problem
the same in "\setupnumber[formula]"

example:

\setupnumber[formula][way=bysection,numbersection=yes,prefix=yes,prefixsegments=chapter:section]
\starttext
\chapter{one}
\section{one}
See formula \in[eq:3]
\section{two}
\placeformula[eq:3]
\startformula
   f(x)=x^3
\stopformula
\stoptext

--
Best regards,

Huang Ze
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Issues with number of formula

[views63]

Oh，sorry in http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2010/047258.html
the way "setupformulas[numbercolor=blue,numberstyle=bold,prefixsegments=1:100,way=bysection]"
was work.
but what's the "prefixsegments=1:100" mean？

--
Best regards,

Huang Ze

2010/10/26 views63 <views63@gmail.com>:
> Hi all
>
> I found an issues with number of formula in latest beta (MkIV)
>
> example：
>
> \setupenumerations
> [formula]
> [way=bysection,
>  prefix=yes,
>  prefixsegments=chapter:section]
> \starttext
> \chapter{one}
> \section{one}
> See formula \in[eq:3]
> \section{two}
> \placeformula[eq:3]
> \startformula
>   f(x)=x^3
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
>
> 1. missing a dot in the  number of formula.
>
> I must add "\defineenumeration[definition][text=Definition]"
> change"\setupenumerations[definition,formula][...]"
> and use once
>
>  \startdefinition
> some text
> \stopdefinition
>
> before the "\placeformula"
>
> 2. in cross-reference,it was missing the section number the problem
> the same in "\setupnumber[formula]"
>
> example:
>
> \setupnumber[formula][way=bysection,numbersection=yes,prefix=yes,prefixsegments=chapter:section]
> \starttext
> \chapter{one}
> \section{one}
> See formula \in[eq:3]
> \section{two}
> \placeformula[eq:3]
> \startformula
>   f(x)=x^3
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Huang Ze
>
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Issues with number of formula

[Hans Hagen]

On 26-10-2010 4:40, views63 wrote:
> Oh，sorry in http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2010/047258.html
> the way "setupformulas[numbercolor=blue,numberstyle=bold,prefixsegments=1:100,way=bysection]"
> was work.
> but what's the "prefixsegments=1:100"

that you can upto 100 prefixes

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1....<somenumber>

not that we have that many levels predefined

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Issues with number of formula

[views63]

Thanks a lot.
btw, the way in subsectin or more is failed

--
Best regards,

Huang Ze

2010/10/26 Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>:
> On 26-10-2010 4:40, views63 wrote:
>>
>> Oh，sorry in http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2010/047258.html
>> the way
>> "setupformulas[numbercolor=blue,numberstyle=bold,prefixsegments=1:100,way=bysection]"
>> was work.
>> but what's the "prefixsegments=1:100"
>
> that you can upto 100 prefixes
>
> 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1....<somenumber>
>
> not that we have that many levels predefined
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>    tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
>                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________