ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Haltiwanger <john.haltiwanger@gmail.com>
To: Mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Grammar
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:12:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimtRCdkSAtd0gW42enS87j4iK0qUsYD9Tac2ADp@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100727133136.GA5455@phare.normalesup.org>

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Arthur Reutenauer
<arthur.reutenauer@normalesup.org> wrote:
>> I for one have always thought it would be interesting to develop a
>> Unicode character that provides a symbol representing a neutral gender
>> pronoun.
>
>  Unicode encodes scripts, not languages, so that's outside of its
> scope.  Even if you were to develop a new character that would function
> as a neutral gender pronoun in English or other languages, it would
> still be attached to one (or several) language(s).  You're of course
> free to advocate its use in all existing languages with a written
> standard, but that would take some time ;-)  And even then, it would
> leave out the vast majority of languages, those that are only spoken.

I don't see how this applies: there are plenty of characters provided
by Unicode that can be used regardless of which language I am writing
in.. such as the male/female symbols already mentioned. So in this
case, it would be a symbol for the 'language of the internet', not
simply for a single language. Some symbols are available regardless of
the general language used, correct?

Granted, I know next to nothing about font encodings, so I'll defer
here to the knowledge of others.
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-27 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-26 16:23 Grammar Richard Stephens
2010-07-26 20:20 ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-26 20:48   ` Grammar Khaled Hosny
2010-07-26 21:25   ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-27  8:47   ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-27 13:06     ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-27 13:17       ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-27 13:24         ` Grammar luigi scarso
2010-07-27 13:26         ` Grammar Procházka Lukáš
2010-07-27 13:38           ` Grammar Taco Hoekwater
2010-07-27 15:16           ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 15:28             ` Grammar Arthur Reutenauer
2010-07-27 15:38               ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 13:31       ` Grammar Arthur Reutenauer
2010-07-27 14:12         ` John Haltiwanger [this message]
2010-07-27 15:04           ` Grammar Arthur Reutenauer
2010-07-27 14:10       ` Grammar David Rogers
2010-07-27 14:15         ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-27 16:33           ` Grammar David Rogers
2010-07-27 16:59             ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 17:03               ` Grammar Taco Hoekwater
2010-07-27 15:27       ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 17:08         ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-27 23:10         ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-27 23:40           ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-28  9:28           ` Grammar Henning Hraban Ramm
2010-07-28 13:14             ` Grammar Alain Delmotte
2010-07-27 22:57       ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-28  5:00         ` Grammar David Rogers
2010-07-28 12:45           ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-28  9:29         ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-28  9:39           ` Grammar Thomas A. Schmitz
2010-07-28 13:00             ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-28 13:12           ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-24 22:50 Semantic data in ConTeXt? Matija Šuklje
2010-07-25 21:33 ` Matija Šuklje
2010-07-25 23:47   ` Grammar (was: Semantic data in ConTeXt?) David Rogers
2010-07-26  8:23     ` Matija Šuklje
2010-07-26  9:48       ` John Haltiwanger
2010-07-26 10:06         ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-26 10:20           ` Grammar luigi scarso
2010-07-26 11:56             ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-26 12:38               ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-26 19:33               ` Grammar Martin Schröder
2010-07-26 20:44                 ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 16:53         ` Grammar (was: Semantic data in ConTeXt?) Rory Molinari
2010-07-27 23:12           ` Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-28  0:00             ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-28  9:33               ` Grammar John Haltiwanger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTimtRCdkSAtd0gW42enS87j4iK0qUsYD9Tac2ADp@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=john.haltiwanger@gmail.com \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).