From: John Haltiwanger <john.haltiwanger@gmail.com>
To: Mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Grammar
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:12:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimtRCdkSAtd0gW42enS87j4iK0qUsYD9Tac2ADp@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100727133136.GA5455@phare.normalesup.org>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Arthur Reutenauer
<arthur.reutenauer@normalesup.org> wrote:
>> I for one have always thought it would be interesting to develop a
>> Unicode character that provides a symbol representing a neutral gender
>> pronoun.
>
> Unicode encodes scripts, not languages, so that's outside of its
> scope. Even if you were to develop a new character that would function
> as a neutral gender pronoun in English or other languages, it would
> still be attached to one (or several) language(s). You're of course
> free to advocate its use in all existing languages with a written
> standard, but that would take some time ;-) And even then, it would
> leave out the vast majority of languages, those that are only spoken.
I don't see how this applies: there are plenty of characters provided
by Unicode that can be used regardless of which language I am writing
in.. such as the male/female symbols already mentioned. So in this
case, it would be a symbol for the 'language of the internet', not
simply for a single language. Some symbols are available regardless of
the general language used, correct?
Granted, I know next to nothing about font encodings, so I'll defer
here to the knowledge of others.
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-27 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-26 16:23 Grammar Richard Stephens
2010-07-26 20:20 ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-26 20:48 ` Grammar Khaled Hosny
2010-07-26 21:25 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-27 8:47 ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-27 13:06 ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-27 13:17 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-27 13:24 ` Grammar luigi scarso
2010-07-27 13:26 ` Grammar Procházka Lukáš
2010-07-27 13:38 ` Grammar Taco Hoekwater
2010-07-27 15:16 ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 15:28 ` Grammar Arthur Reutenauer
2010-07-27 15:38 ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 13:31 ` Grammar Arthur Reutenauer
2010-07-27 14:12 ` John Haltiwanger [this message]
2010-07-27 15:04 ` Grammar Arthur Reutenauer
2010-07-27 14:10 ` Grammar David Rogers
2010-07-27 14:15 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-27 16:33 ` Grammar David Rogers
2010-07-27 16:59 ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 17:03 ` Grammar Taco Hoekwater
2010-07-27 15:27 ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 17:08 ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-27 23:10 ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-27 23:40 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-28 9:28 ` Grammar Henning Hraban Ramm
2010-07-28 13:14 ` Grammar Alain Delmotte
2010-07-27 22:57 ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-28 5:00 ` Grammar David Rogers
2010-07-28 12:45 ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-28 9:29 ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
2010-07-28 9:39 ` Grammar Thomas A. Schmitz
2010-07-28 13:00 ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-28 13:12 ` Grammar Marcin Borkowski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-24 22:50 Semantic data in ConTeXt? Matija Šuklje
2010-07-25 21:33 ` Matija Šuklje
2010-07-25 23:47 ` Grammar (was: Semantic data in ConTeXt?) David Rogers
2010-07-26 8:23 ` Matija Šuklje
2010-07-26 9:48 ` John Haltiwanger
2010-07-26 10:06 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-26 10:20 ` Grammar luigi scarso
2010-07-26 11:56 ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-26 12:38 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-26 19:33 ` Grammar Martin Schröder
2010-07-26 20:44 ` Grammar Matija Šuklje
2010-07-27 16:53 ` Grammar (was: Semantic data in ConTeXt?) Rory Molinari
2010-07-27 23:12 ` Marcin Borkowski
2010-07-28 0:00 ` Grammar Hans Hagen
2010-07-28 9:33 ` Grammar John Haltiwanger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTimtRCdkSAtd0gW42enS87j4iK0qUsYD9Tac2ADp@mail.gmail.com \
--to=john.haltiwanger@gmail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).