ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: views63 <views63@gmail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Issues with number of formula
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:31:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinSVGCEMp+06Gbpy6QxujMBUJGDRwywARRr2xB6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi all

I found an issues with number of formula in latest beta (MkIV)

example:

\setupenumerations
[formula]
[way=bysection,
 prefix=yes,
 prefixsegments=chapter:section]
\starttext
\chapter{one}
\section{one}
See formula \in[eq:3]
\section{two}
\placeformula[eq:3]
\startformula
   f(x)=x^3
\stopformula
\stoptext

1. missing a dot in the  number of formula.

I must add "\defineenumeration[definition][text=Definition]"
change"\setupenumerations[definition,formula][...]"
and use once

 \startdefinition
some text
\stopdefinition

before the "\placeformula"

2. in cross-reference,it was missing the section number the problem
the same in "\setupnumber[formula]"

example:

\setupnumber[formula][way=bysection,numbersection=yes,prefix=yes,prefixsegments=chapter:section]
\starttext
\chapter{one}
\section{one}
See formula \in[eq:3]
\section{two}
\placeformula[eq:3]
\startformula
   f(x)=x^3
\stopformula
\stoptext

--
Best regards,

Huang Ze
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

             reply	other threads:[~2010-10-26  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-26  1:31 views63 [this message]
2010-10-26  2:40 ` views63
2010-10-26  7:40   ` Hans Hagen
2010-10-26  9:00     ` views63

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTinSVGCEMp+06Gbpy6QxujMBUJGDRwywARRr2xB6@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=views63@gmail.com \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).