From: Jon Crump <jjcrump@uw.edu>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: \note and \footnote
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:42:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinWDtM0_Bnv6o886M1-1zHn7ZaPV1N2jB=QORmy@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikLikZQkw-n-=MaoxYbw2QcQc74sC4Qb9E2C+2F@mail.gmail.com>
even more minimal, I tried running context on this:
\starttext
some text with footnote\footnote[f]{footnote text} \\
some text with reference\note[f]
\stoptext
and got the same phenomenon:
some text with footnote 1
some text with reference ??
Something about the \note[] mechanism I'm not getting?
Jon
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Jon Crump <jjcrump@uw.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz
> <thomas.schmitz@uni-bonn.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 23, 2010, at 10:17 PM, Jon Crump wrote:
>>
>>> My thought, ill-informed perhaps, was simply for clarity: to make it
>>> clear that I'm using the same value in both \note[] and \footnote[].
>>> In any case, sadly, using what you suggest still gets me the same
>>> result.
>>
>> I get correct output here. Try deleting the doublefoot.tuc file and rerunning ConTeXt.
>
> mysterious: I tried that and got the same output; both for your version and mine
>
> attached .tex and .pdf
>
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-23 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-23 20:11 Jon Crump
2010-12-23 20:36 ` Yury G. Kudryashov
2010-12-23 20:47 ` Jon Crump
2010-12-23 20:58 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2010-12-23 21:17 ` Jon Crump
2010-12-23 21:20 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2010-12-23 21:34 ` Jon Crump
2010-12-23 21:41 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2010-12-23 21:47 ` Jon Crump
2010-12-23 22:03 ` Jon Crump
2010-12-23 21:42 ` Jon Crump [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTinWDtM0_Bnv6o886M1-1zHn7ZaPV1N2jB=QORmy@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jjcrump@uw.edu \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).