From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/64808 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jon Crump Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: \note and \footnote Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:42:53 -0800 Message-ID: References: <7B8BD966-D408-40C8-886B-6518FD3A9403@uni-bonn.de> <8D0BE1DB-7FEA-4827-997F-BC4B4A5831E7@uni-bonn.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293140594 16417 80.91.229.12 (23 Dec 2010 21:43:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:43:14 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Dec 23 22:43:11 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PVswI-0000TC-Rq for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:43:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94A6CA949; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:43:10 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id t0wY-Ye5axcd; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:43:10 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B92CA981; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:43:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA342CA949 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:43:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4vir933E3Qne for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:42:55 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter5-ams.mf.surf.net (filter5-ams.mf.surf.net [192.87.102.73]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70827CA989 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:42:55 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f169.google.com (mail-qy0-f169.google.com [209.85.216.169]) by filter5-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id oBNLgr9n015760 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:42:54 +0100 Original-Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so7448840qyk.14 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:42:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.229.183.147 with SMTP id cg19mr7761600qcb.37.1293140573148; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:42:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.229.239.11 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:42:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=209.85.216.169; country=US; region=CA; city=Mountain View; postalcode=94043; latitude=37.4192; longitude=-122.0574; metrocode=807; areacode=650; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.4192,-122.0574&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0BDKJGS3g - 76eca4fe6430 - 20101223 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.87.102.73 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:64808 Archived-At: even more minimal, I tried running context on this: \starttext some text with footnote\footnote[f]{footnote text} \\ some text with reference\note[f] \stoptext and got the same phenomenon: some text with footnote 1 some text with reference ?? Something about the \note[] mechanism I'm not getting? Jon On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Jon Crump wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz > wrote: >> >> On Dec 23, 2010, at 10:17 PM, Jon Crump wrote: >> >>> My thought, ill-informed perhaps, was simply for clarity: to make it >>> clear that I'm using the same value in both \note[] and \footnote[]. >>> In any case, sadly, using what you suggest still gets me the same >>> result. >> >> I get correct output here. Try deleting the doublefoot.tuc file and rerunning ConTeXt. > > mysterious: I tried that and got the same output; both for your version and mine > > attached .tex and .pdf > ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________