From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/58664 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mojca Miklavec Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: weird en/em dash behaviour Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 20:54:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100404204906.5fc24a02@vorbis> <4BB8E655.4050607@googlemail.com> <20100404211733.1456892f@vorbis> <4BB9880C.1000900@elvenkind.com> <20100510182959.1f6f3d16@vorbis> <4BE841AC.2030000@wxs.nl> <20100510193449.2f913cef@vorbis> <20100510202522.24c57510@vorbis> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1273517662 7784 80.91.229.12 (10 May 2010 18:54:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 18:54:22 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon May 10 20:54:20 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBY7P-0007LM-5G for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:54:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9A0C9B07; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:54:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NIMLyvOErhiT; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:54:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C01C9B80; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:54:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D62C9B80 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:54:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09tUI-LeL+VG for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:54:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA84C9B07 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:54:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so33446wwf.14 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:54:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/Su7slLL0KAACJ1CveA497Br9jvHId/r42NuW5FGsZM=; b=tGWboAEqyzqhnrtePaUQVKsjct8MFLtWaIn+D0KjkLhnX833RPxh1FdrRkNU5z3/dn 5Mn/TjT/r43CVqJSL3X1Mh3CilPk8J4KPZRlefBIIaNWFmgfxePUIF2kGagCEg9tg6zy C8QdCM7rIrJZGCD5rMlEDpRF7MFGDRMcOGMCs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=D/6oj+lb3VBeQBBwbNiRGQZPhigsVvlb5gzPFKURU8hz2aeVqP+cUOI9HyAM6QUazi TApjZRcLnXmzvSxHD78N/BK1+a9TqTWgcjI7Qg8Goi9lyurvfx2N4S6xVSLWKT2FDN6J y6yX6H9J3Wly5sFhIZV4VoOYm9urmlJpweI4I= Original-Received: by 10.216.163.202 with SMTP id a52mr2720130wel.81.1273517648515; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.216.180.140 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:54:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100510202522.24c57510@vorbis> X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:58664 Archived-At: On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 20:25, Marco wrote: >> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Marco wrote: >> >> must be something in your system as i see those dashed here >> > I don't think so. I suspect a linux-x86 issue, since the only >> > persons who confirmed this bug were Luigi and Taco, and both run >> > linux-x86 systems. But maybe I'm wrong. I use freshly updated >> > minimals from the garden, so nothing special. >> On my linux box it's now OK with last current > Oh, I see. Can somebody confirm the missing glyphs? My output is > attached. I can only confirm that they are not missing in your attachment. The dashes are very thin, so maybe your PDF viewer doesn't show them until you make a slightly bigger magnification. Mojca ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________