From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/81883 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Meer, H. van der" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: endnotemarkers Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:35:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <736CEF0F-DDF1-4E6D-9F68-6216918DB89E@uva.nl> <2DB2F519-4775-4908-9692-5D75683A8150@gmail.com> <516EF7CA.4010603@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366227317 2073 80.91.229.3 (17 Apr 2013 19:35:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:35:17 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Apr 17 21:35:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1USY8V-0005rL-6q for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:35:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97443101F6; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:35:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id u-l1LXLowrUc; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:35:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55225101E8; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:35:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2399F101E8 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:35:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id SSLAn-DLHTLC for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:35:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter1-ams.mf.surf.net (filter1-ams.mf.surf.net [192.87.102.69]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9552101E7 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:35:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from HUB02.uva.nl (hub02.uva.nl [146.50.108.231]) by filter1-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r3HJZBHl000680 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:35:12 +0200 Original-Received: from MBX02.uva.nl ([169.254.2.121]) by HUB02.uva.nl ([2002:9232:6ce7::9232:6ce7]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:35:11 +0200 Thread-Topic: [NTG-context] endnotemarkers Thread-Index: AQHOO5i0pD3I0+97Bke3yal5tGcpcJjambSAgAAQ9wCAAAH2gA== In-Reply-To: <516EF7CA.4010603@wxs.nl> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [82.95.102.36] Content-ID: X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=146.50.108.231; country=NL; region=07; city=Amsterdam; latitude=52.3500; longitude=4.9167; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.3500,4.9167&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0NJp7zczJ - 04573eff687c - 20130417 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.87.102.69 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:81883 Archived-At: A minor point perhaps on this textcommand= \groupedcommand for the marking of the notes in the text. I tried this but now the marking is not typeset as a superscript. Hans van der Meer On 17 Apr 2013, at 9:28 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 4/17/2013 8:27 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >> >> Am 17.04.2013 um 20:23 schrieb "Meer, H. van der" : >> >>> With the following setup my endnotes show up in the list with [number], as I would like to have it. But in the text they do not appear as [number] but just as plain numbers. >>> Why does textcommand has not this effect, whereas numbercommand does? The manual strongly suggest this to me. >>> >>> \def\fnmarker#1{[#1]} >>> \setupnotation[endnote][numbercommand=\fnmarker,textcommand=\fnmarker] >> >> \setupnote [endnote][textcommand=\groupedcommand{[}{]}] >> \setupnotation[endnote][numbercommand=\groupedcommand{[}{]}] > > neat > > Hans > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE > Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands > tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com > | www.pragma-pod.nl > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________