From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/12569 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Martin Moncrieffe Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: bib module/cite Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:20:54 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: References: Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1057055100 26065 80.91.224.249 (1 Jul 2003 10:25:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 10:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Tue Jul 01 12:24:59 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19XIJn-0006mD-00 for ; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 12:24:59 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B5410B04; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:25:23 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from mole.bio.cam.ac.uk (mole.bio.cam.ac.uk [131.111.36.9]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5854F10ACC for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:20:56 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from dirac.bioc.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.43.147] helo=cam.ac.uk) by mole.bio.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2 (SGI IRIX)) id 19XIFr-06zOCD-00 for ; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:20:55 +0100 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:12569 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:12569 Hi All I have a question which I hope someone can answer. If I do \cite[number][ref1, ref2, ref3], the references are formatted correctly, for example [1,2,3]. If however, I do \cite [ref1, ref2, ref3], then I get [1-2], not [1-3]. How can I fix this? I've searched the ConTeXt mail archives but haven't seen this behavior reported. Regards. __martin