From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/66814 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steffen Wolfrum Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: header entries semi-wrong Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:48:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: <159DC991-683B-4900-8694-EBE92E001829@st.estfiles.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299768576 7407 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2011 14:49:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:49:36 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Mar 10 15:49:32 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxhB7-0007pN-RZ for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:49:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAB1CAADF; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:49:18 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id StGqlqvjEQDv; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:49:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D431CAAD7; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:48:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E21CAACD for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:48:52 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nFRkMgsgFFpb for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:48:41 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter4-til.mf.surf.net (filter4-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.220]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B103BCAAD9 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:48:41 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.102]) by filter4-til.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p2AEmeFe026118 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:48:41 +0100 Original-Received: from [89.247.8.203] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1PxhAO-0006YL-8B; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:48:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Df-Sender: 698580 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=80.67.31.102; country=DE; latitude=51.0000; longitude=9.0000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=51.0000,9.0000&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 05EhqMECB - edc70ad7e35b - 20110310 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.220 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:66814 Archived-At: Am 10.03.2011 um 15:26 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: > = > Am 06.03.2011 um 11:56 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: > = >> Hi, >> = >> please run the minimal example attached: >> = >> --on page 1 there is = >> section "1.1 one" and you get the header entry "1.1 one" >> - on page 3 there is still = >> section "1.1 one" and you get the header entry "1.2 one" (<- ?!) >> - on page 5 there is = >> section "1.2 two" and you get the header entry "1.2 two" >> = >> you see the problem? the "getmarking" behaves correctly (one/one/two) >> while the "headnumber" is confused (1.1/1.2/1.2))! >> = >> Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? > = > TeX reads always more text than it needs for a page and in your example > the =93Section 1.2=94 was seen by TeX when it was building page 3 although > it didn=92t fit and was postponed till page 4. Sure, but why does TeX write "1.2 one"? The second part "one" is correct ..= . = Why can't both parts be synchronized (correctly of course!)?? Steffen ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________