* subfootnote with wrong structureconversionset
@ 2012-03-19 21:27 Steffen Wolfrum
2012-03-20 5:17 ` Wolfgang Schuster
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Wolfrum @ 2012-03-19 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hi,
are subfootnotes not yet rewritten, or did the syntax change?
The following example expects 2.a but gives 2.1:
\definestructureseparatorset [footnote][][]
\definestructureconversionset[footnote][numbers,characters][numbers]
\setupenumerations[footnote][numberconversionset=footnote,numberseparatorset=footnote]
\starttext
test \footnote{xxxx}
text
test \startfootnote note \stopfootnote
test \startsubfootnote subnote \stopsubfootnote
test \startfootnote note \stopfootnote
\stoptext
Steffen
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: subfootnote with wrong structureconversionset
2012-03-19 21:27 subfootnote with wrong structureconversionset Steffen Wolfrum
@ 2012-03-20 5:17 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2012-03-20 7:47 ` [***SPAM***] " Steffen Wolfrum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2012-03-20 5:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Am 19.03.2012 um 22:27 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
> Hi,
>
> are subfootnotes not yet rewritten, or did the syntax change?
>
> The following example expects 2.a but gives 2.1:
>
> \definestructureseparatorset [footnote][][]
> \definestructureconversionset[footnote][numbers,characters][numbers]
> \setupenumerations[footnote][numberconversionset=footnote,numberseparatorset=footnote]
Use \setupnotation[footnote][…].
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [***SPAM***] Re: subfootnote with wrong structureconversionset
2012-03-20 5:17 ` Wolfgang Schuster
@ 2012-03-20 7:47 ` Steffen Wolfrum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Wolfrum @ 2012-03-20 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Am 20.03.2012 um 06:17 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
>
> Am 19.03.2012 um 22:27 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> are subfootnotes not yet rewritten, or did the syntax change?
>>
>> The following example expects 2.a but gives 2.1:
>>
>> \definestructureseparatorset [footnote][][]
>> \definestructureconversionset[footnote][numbers,characters][numbers]
>> \setupenumerations[footnote][numberconversionset=footnote,numberseparatorset=footnote]
>
> Use \setupnotation[footnote][…].
Right, thank you!
The new footnote structure seems to tidy up and settle things neatly in \setupnote and \setupnotation.
(eg. numbercommand now looks indeed more reasonable to me in setupnotation than it did before on setupnote)
As it grows older ConTeXt gets more and more beautiful ;o)
Steffen
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-20 7:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-19 21:27 subfootnote with wrong structureconversionset Steffen Wolfrum
2012-03-20 5:17 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2012-03-20 7:47 ` [***SPAM***] " Steffen Wolfrum
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).