Many thanks Aditya so, a) still cannot understand where are sources on my macosx with texlive b) being a unix ignorant, what should I write on terminal? Best -a- On 10 May 2007, at 23:59, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2007, Andrea Valle wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I've written an introduction to SuperCollider with ConTeXt. >> >> http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/sw/sc/prd_tSCIRMA.pdf >> >> I'm really happy of the result. Now, it has been suggested to have >> the >> included code accessible in some "cleaner" way (i.e. the >> supercollider source >> code as it is). >> My idea would be to add a link on something (e.g. a title of the code >> fragment) so that clicking on it in the pdf would open via a txt >> editor (or >> a browser, that's the same) the related sc source file. >> Something like opening movies or audio files, but with a text file. >> >> I guess it's simple but until now I found no way, >> > > \attachfile > > grep the sources for documentation. > > Aditya > ______________________________________________________________________ > _____________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an > entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ > ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ______________________________________________________________________ > _____________ -------------------------------------------------- Andrea Valle -------------------------------------------------- CIRMA - DAMS Università degli Studi di Torino --> http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/ --> andrea.valle@unito.it -------------------------------------------------- I did this interview where I just mentioned that I read Foucault. Who doesn't in university, right? I was in this strip club giving this guy a lap dance and all he wanted to do was to discuss Foucault with me. Well, I can stand naked and do my little dance, or I can discuss Foucault, but not at the same time; too much information. (Annabel Chong)