From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/43546 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_D=C9TREZ?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: big are big with lucida Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:08:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2F62A736-AC62-4C59-A8D2-52668BE95FEE@mac.com> <68bfdc900808290300m68eb72d9oc5c920c6024a2f79@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220008219 29105 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2008 11:10:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:10:19 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Aug 29 13:11:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZ1sg-0006Xe-3H for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:11:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A927E1FD3B; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:10:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20284-01-4; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:09:09 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C779C1FCB7; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:09:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306D91FBE8 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:09:06 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18570-01-15 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:08:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0791FCCE for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:08:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AED3EA0D9 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:08:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.1] (haz59-1-88-169-181-119.fbx.proxad.net [88.169.181.119]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A87D3EA0D5 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:08:31 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <68bfdc900808290300m68eb72d9oc5c920c6024a2f79@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:43546 Le 29 ao=FBt 08 =E0 12:00, Yue Wang a =E9crit : > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric D=C9TREZ wrote: >> Hello >> >> The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with >> lucida. >> >> I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says >> ****************************************** >> \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{8.20}} >> \def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{10.80}} >> \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{13.42}} >> \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{16.03}} >> \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{17.72}} >> \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{21.25}} >> ****************************************** >> Shouldn't it says >> ****************************************** >> \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{0.920}} >> \def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{1.080}} >> \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{1.342}} >> \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{1.603}} >> \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{1.772}} >> \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{2.125}} >> ****************************************** >> ? > > How do you get these variables? the symbols in lucida math are = > different. I just divided the size by 10 with a modification for big (doesn't = understand why, see the second part of my question). They look like the sizes in math-tex ****************************************** \def\PLAINbig {\@@dobig{0.85}} \def\PLAINBig {\@@dobig{1.15}} \def\PLAINbigg{\@@dobig{1.45}} \def\PLAINBigg{\@@dobig{1.75}} ****************************************** > you can also refer to > ftp://ftp.comp.hkbu.edu.hk/pub/TeX/CTAN/macros/latex/contrib/psnfssx/luci= dabr/lucidabr.pdf = > . > page 9, line 263-273 Indeed the original sizes are the same. But the lucidabr package uses 8.20 pt and context uses a multiple of = fontsize : ****************************************** \def\@@dobig#1#2% {{\hbox{$\left#2\vbox\!!to#1\bodyfontsize{}\right.\n@space$}}} ****************************************** Does anybody understand why big with \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{0.930}} is = bigger than Big with \def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{1.080}} ? >> There is a strange behavior : if I put >> \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{0.930}} >> big is bigger than Big. >> How is this possible ? ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________