From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/14743 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thomas A.Schmitz Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Not seeing the wood because of so many trees Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:17:34 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: References: Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1077038791 23985 80.91.224.253 (17 Feb 2004 17:26:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Tue Feb 17 18:26:24 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1At8zI-0006Fg-00 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:26:24 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585D210B49; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:24:37 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com (mailout04.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.18]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABB810ABB for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:16:43 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from fwd08.aul.t-online.de by mailout04.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1At0Qt-0000EC-00; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:18:19 +0100 Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] (EY49A2ZSweFnxvIteP7pK2NhNQIOa7SIXOV67ee-Is9UQT7VqrVDEa@[80.128.243.88]) by fmrl08.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1At0QS-1UopX60; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:17:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612) X-Seen: false X-ID: EY49A2ZSweFnxvIteP7pK2NhNQIOa7SIXOV67ee-Is9UQT7VqrVDEa@t-dialin.net Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:14743 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:14743 Sorry for going back to an older thread, but I don't think the question was answered properly. Alexander Klink wanted to know how to typeset "{" and "}". Suggestions were "\type|{| and \type|}|" or "$\{$ and $\}$". Neither of which is satisfactory, because it will typeset them either in typewriter or in math font. We had a discussion about similar questions a while ago. I still think we should have "\{" and "\}" for this kind of thing. As long as this isn't available, I see no better solution than "\getglyph{Serif}{123}" and "\getglyph{Serif}{125}" vel. sim. For those of us working in the humanities, these curly braces are sometimes necessary (e.g., in critical editions), and having them in typewriter or math fonts isn't acceptable. So may I continue my rally for \{ etc.? All best Thomas