> On 19 Sep 2016, at 13:27, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Henri Menke wrote: >> You can start itemize only in vertical mode. To switch to vertical mode use \blank. To kill the empty line which is inserted use \blank[-line]. >> >> \starttext >> \startitemize[n] >> \item \blank[-line] >> \startitemize[a,horizontal,three] >> \startitem First \stopitem >> \startitem Second \stopitem >> \startitem Third \stopitem >> \startitem Fourth \stopitem >> \stopitemize >> \item On the outer level >> \stopitemize >> \stoptext >> >> On 09/18/2016 10:54 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> 1) the following code >>> >>> \starttext >>> \startitemize[n] >>> \item >>> \startitemize[a,horizontal,three] >>> \startitem First \stopitem >>> \startitem Second \stopitem >>> \startitem Third \stopitem >>> \startitem Fourth \stopitem >>> \stopitemize >>> \item On the outer level >>> \stopitemize >>> \stoptext >>> >>> generates the error >>> >>> tex error > tex error on line 9 in file >>> /home/mickep/tmp/ctx-listexample14.tex: ! You can't use `\prevdepth' >>> in restricted horizontal mode >>> >>> Isn't it possible to have nested itemize with key horizontal? >>> >>> 2) If I change the horizontal key to columns, then there is an extra >>> line (the extra line in nested itemization has been discussed before, >>> but not with these keys given, as far as I could see). I.e. the file >>> >>> \starttext >>> \startitemize[n] >>> \item >>> \startitemize[a,columns,three] >>> \startitem First \stopitem >>> \startitem Second \stopitem >>> \startitem Third \stopitem >>> \startitem Fourth \stopitem >>> \stopitemize >>> \item On the outer level >>> \stopitemize >>> \stoptext >>> >>> gives the attached pdf file, where I would have exptected the first a. >>> in the inner itemize to be on the same line as the 1. in the outer >>> itemize. >>> >>> Anyone has an idea on what is going on here? >>> >>> Best regards, Mikael >>> >>> >>> >>> ___________________________________________________________________________________ >>> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! >>> >>> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context >>> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net >>> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ >>> wiki : http://contextgarden.net >>> ___________________________________________________________________________________ >>> >> >> ___________________________________________________________________________________ >> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! >> >> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context >> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net >> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ >> wiki : http://contextgarden.net >> ___________________________________________________________________________________ > > > Thank you Henri, that works, and I can live with adding \blank[-line] > in these cases. > > I still wonder if there is an automatic way, since it seems to only > happen when one has the inner itemize in columns. For example, with > > \starttext > \startitemize[n] > \item > \startitemize[a] > \startitem First \stopitem > \startitem Second \stopitem > \startitem Third \stopitem > \startitem Fourth \stopitem > \stopitemize > \item On the outer level > \stopitemize > \stoptext > > there is no extra line (result is attached). > > /Mikael > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________