* Bug: missing stopper?
@ 2006-11-27 8:52 Oliver Buerschaper
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Oliver Buerschaper @ 2006-11-27 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello,
playing with \defineenumeration I noticed some weird behaviour:
whenever I set an enumeration to be unnumbered the stopper is
mysteriously suppressed ... I searched the mailing list for this
problem and I discovered that people have experienced problems
related to the stopper option before. However, these appeared to have
been solved. Now I'm not sure whether I missed a detail or stumbled
upon a potentially remaining bug.
\defineenumeration [theorem] [text=Theorem]
\defineenumeration [remark] [text=Remark]
\setupenumerations [location=serried,width=fit,distance=1em,stopper=.]
\setupenumerations [remark] [number=no]
\starttext
\starttheorem
\input ward
\stoptheorem
\startremark
\input tufte
\stopremark
\stoptext
By the way what's the role of the option right I found in the source
code? Same as stopper? Deprecated?
Best wishes,
Oliver
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-11-27 8:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-11-27 8:52 Bug: missing stopper? Oliver Buerschaper
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).