From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/86384 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_M=C3=B6bius?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: setupenumerations overwriting setupitemize Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:45:06 +0100 Message-ID: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392903915 3508 80.91.229.3 (20 Feb 2014 13:45:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:45:15 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Feb 20 14:45:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([5.39.185.229]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WGTwK-0002Ja-1g for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:45:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DB0101EB; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:45:23 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6eqxo1V57LN3; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:45:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6D5101E6; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:45:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536A3101E6 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:45:20 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DtFsrAUzmgxg for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:45:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter4-ams.mf.surf.net (filter4-ams.mf.surf.net [192.87.102.72]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891F9101E2 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:45:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) by filter4-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id s1KE0AUP001637 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:00:11 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id x3so3246448qcv.2 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 05:45:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FSJGTMiphjqindHD2twCQmnX+eRRQWEh3RLnA2mxnJM=; b=PiApKi368mnZ2hgXN6vp+aNq3yUMNn0rm1AHfRM+bC+fbpv3aCHUHvlwvlAr28gBXl ra8TiOQtgC3BIO0JlFsEdknYRnQNT6dg4tHoaR6tzbHSeUfIOihHzau4H7U6kCYo2D9S wzKcHMDjF7YVzJAaJT79F/g6BQ8gvblASJB2gs37xpaymt1evU4B+/0+5wRQw9axvUZM OdBnwrF34Ms7kzv7RD7QjESrDBeygo7u98+A7qUEfvg+zfEFkyLxDK5hkyTvVUv6grIx JEVbOXpdEv4XNukUwqD8df6xHPGpDOZbLWU5HP6rkyOPHFBHDLS41m90N9+hCxLc9KlT Wd8g== X-Received: by 10.224.98.139 with SMTP id q11mr1623132qan.64.1392903906545; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 05:45:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.96.192.100 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 05:45:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZYOuuyJ8zki2SPzUm9beugqraZ4 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: ntg-context@ntg.nl, base:default, @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b; country=US X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 01LsC0bve - 83f458ada2cb - 20140220 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:86384 Archived-At: A general question. I use setupenumerations to define theorem-, lemma-, and definition-environments for my document. I realised that setupenumerations is overwriting keys that are set in setupitemize (and groups defined by defineitemgroup). ~~~snip~~~ \setupenumerations [numberconversion=numbers] \starttext \startitemize[a] \item Text Text \item Text Text \stopitemize \stoptext ~~~snip~~~ vs. ~~~snip~~~ %\setupenumerations [numberconversion=numbers] \starttext \startitemize[a] \item Text Text \item Text Text \stopitemize \stoptext ~~~snip~~~ This is unintuitive for me.. Is this expected behaviour?? ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________