From: cryo shock <axteffekt@gmail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Strange behaviour with spacing in itemization using "columns" vs "horizontal".
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:34:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAiy42dhi0rOpkfimn4OAq3wnSifmkRaLcN0yD2BpMfZo-d7-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 979 bytes --]
Hi folks,
I noticed a difference in how spacing is set after an itemization.
I have the following example:
-----------------------------
\starttext
\startitemize[packed, joinedup, columns, two]
\startitem
top left item
\stopitem
\startitem
bottom left item
\stopitem
\startitem
top right item
\stopitem
\startitem
bottom right item
\stopitem
\stopitemize
Notice the size of the blank space?
\startitemize[packed, joinedup, horizontal, two]
\startitem
top left item
\stopitem
\startitem
top right item
\stopitem
\startitem
bottom left item
\stopitem
\startitem
bottom right item
\stopitem
\stopitemize
Notice the size of the blank space?
\stoptext
---------------------------------
Both itemizations are the same except item order and using "columns" in the
first one and "horizontal" in the second. Yet the spacing after the first
itemization seems not right. Or do I oversee something?
Greetings, Sebastian
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1542 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 492 bytes --]
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-28 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-28 23:34 cryo shock [this message]
2017-03-29 17:12 ` Hans Hagen
2017-03-29 17:31 ` Hans Hagen
2017-03-29 19:37 ` cryo shock
2017-04-05 22:19 ` cryo shock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAiy42dhi0rOpkfimn4OAq3wnSifmkRaLcN0yD2BpMfZo-d7-Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=axteffekt@gmail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).