From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/97674 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: cryo shock Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Strange behaviour with spacing in itemization using "columns" vs "horizontal". Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:34:52 +0200 Message-ID: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1101707763011975161==" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490744143 6612 195.159.176.226 (28 Mar 2017 23:35:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 23:35:43 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Mar 29 01:35:33 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from zapf.boekplan.nl ([5.39.185.232] helo=zapf.ntg.nl) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ct0e1-000837-LG for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:35:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7A284989; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:35:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YWH8Y6Cii6DJ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15A184999; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D13F84999 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:35:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQQ_S_vG6m1p for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:35:05 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f171.google.com (mail-qt0-f171.google.com [209.85.216.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B54D84989 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:34:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f171.google.com with SMTP id i34so78066199qtc.0 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:34:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NOTilM/F86CXVP3ZJtu5xZaD1FaiqybkXo56hjI2Pcw=; b=WTC9IIfTdwABBGxAmzc1purqouqKVgpsSBJWv6SZhd2gszeUwVYCUQ5CcmgUs2n6Cs zovE83evM+LdB9xk4p7NXrTL5ByHwmwrryKVGXyjYGe96lLYtEh+cjzbBoceamfCAT8b 804jUs6LBItc4vJUPGiOY4mvfrVxhNR7b4TOr/fH+jSOEYaoNzAlDOpSoCPczC9LCGdk N4aE8PxFeezzLXeWBy2ZTPx8uUT8CYQsnyKJ8FeDWaZjhOcVQwbEhsBL/LlZPKwxeC3B UkuBB5E1fnTV+T+kMc+fT00BwTY9IQRhauF1sy4vc+YXl//5hXa/PEkmch+BuXSSc0wg WOXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NOTilM/F86CXVP3ZJtu5xZaD1FaiqybkXo56hjI2Pcw=; b=C/5//SVkuTKkh/zby/KdXD4dU+14yCxlrrkr232PdOyltDlwSdbbbX3fhG/v3LdmPN wQvyQxohlQRxg+ThlFjZCeBnB/G06kgUBn7vBVun8a6ghg0DSymd7L0hqcuPT6Qg9tVf U8I17tNWZlpwGTPDBd0jCnJrVIdwUnlCtwKdRcR+59rxuymheVKTsimGvtV+dxpaFAVe b1dcfTDWP8wddvYCGb0FV/D8IxLWq/iTKqqUJJ7Fk5AfKJeR4D9KfZCt92XmZBdUAhGd vnixPlzysEsrGsnfPuw+NWVxj8y2m6tv+Kkcumhz+99BanjeqcyToj+wc6rh0Zlzxu+f fkAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3AvvzBAQVUh81FhoqL8isM1RQf9z2iGO0UpxLcuCebr0pXn134UOwCdYsmXHZpbA86lJMEM4DfSOpMbw== X-Received: by 10.200.47.9 with SMTP id j9mr30965860qta.57.1490744093192; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.12.162.67 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:34:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: "ntg-context" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:97674 Archived-At: --===============1101707763011975161== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113773b4203da1054bd2e8e6 --001a113773b4203da1054bd2e8e6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi folks, I noticed a difference in how spacing is set after an itemization. I have the following example: ----------------------------- \starttext \startitemize[packed, joinedup, columns, two] \startitem top left item \stopitem \startitem bottom left item \stopitem \startitem top right item \stopitem \startitem bottom right item \stopitem \stopitemize Notice the size of the blank space? \startitemize[packed, joinedup, horizontal, two] \startitem top left item \stopitem \startitem top right item \stopitem \startitem bottom left item \stopitem \startitem bottom right item \stopitem \stopitemize Notice the size of the blank space? \stoptext --------------------------------- Both itemizations are the same except item order and using "columns" in the first one and "horizontal" in the second. Yet the spacing after the first itemization seems not right. Or do I oversee something? Greetings, Sebastian --001a113773b4203da1054bd2e8e6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi folks,

I noticed a difference in how= spacing is set after an itemization.
I have the following exampl= e:

-----------------------------
\s= tarttext

\startitemize[packed, joinedup, columns, = two]
=C2=A0 \startitem
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 top left item
=C2=A0 \stopitem
=C2=A0 \startitem
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 = bottom left item
=C2=A0 \stopitem
=C2=A0 \startitem
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 top right item
=C2=A0 \stopitem
= =C2=A0 \startitem
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 bottom right item
=C2= =A0 \stopitem
\stopitemize
Notice the size of the blank= space?

\startitemize[packed, joinedup, horizontal= , two]
=C2=A0 \startitem
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 top left item
=C2=A0 \stopitem
=C2=A0 \startitem
=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 top right item
=C2=A0 \stopitem
=C2=A0 \startitem
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 bottom left item
=C2=A0 \stopitem
=C2=A0 \startitem
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 bottom right item
=C2= =A0 \stopitem
\stopitemize
Notice the size of the blank= space?

\stoptext
----------------= -----------------

Both itemizations are the same e= xcept item order and using "columns" in the first one and "h= orizontal" in the second. Yet the spacing after the first itemization = seems not right. Or do I oversee something?

Greeti= ngs, Sebastian
--001a113773b4203da1054bd2e8e6-- --===============1101707763011975161== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KSWYgeW91ciBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcyBvZiBpbnRlcmVz dCB0byBvdGhlcnMgYXMgd2VsbCwgcGxlYXNlIGFkZCBhbiBlbnRyeSB0byB0aGUgV2lraSEKCm1h aWxsaXN0IDogbnRnLWNvbnRleHRAbnRnLm5sIC8gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5udGcubmwvbWFpbG1hbi9s aXN0aW5mby9udGctY29udGV4dAp3ZWJwYWdlICA6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucHJhZ21hLWFkZS5ubCAv IGh0dHA6Ly9jb250ZXh0LmFhbmhldC5uZXQKYXJjaGl2ZSAgOiBodHRwczovL2JpdGJ1Y2tldC5v cmcvcGhnL2NvbnRleHQtbWlycm9yL2NvbW1pdHMvCndpa2kgICAgIDogaHR0cDovL2NvbnRleHRn YXJkZW4ubmV0Cl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f --===============1101707763011975161==--