Hi Hans, Thanks for your solution. I created a macro, is it "robust" ? Fabrice \setupmathextensible[integral][rightoffset=-3mu,exact=yes,factor=2] \def\integ#1#2#3{\math{\autointegral{#1}{#2}{#3}\diff x}} \starttext \integ{4}{1}{g(x)} \stoptext 2016-12-28 18:40 GMT+01:00 Hans Hagen : > On 12/28/2016 6:14 PM, Alan Braslau wrote: > >> Hi Hans, Hi list, >> >> This is similar to what we have discussed earlier on this list and >> elsewhere regarding \over vs. \frac. (I agree with Knuth that {a \over >> b} is *much* more readable in running source code than \frac{a}{b} but >> have resigned myself to use \frac{}{}, as this can be made better >> behaved and gives a much better result.) >> >> Other traditional TeX constructs like \int^a_b have their charm (and >> need to remain supported, just like is \over), but I support >> introducing and encouraging the use of new constructs like your example >> below. An alternative syntax (that could co-exist) would be admitting >> $\left\int ... \right.$, but I do not know what limitations there might >> be with both the (luatex) engine and with ConTeXt. >> > > the tricky part there is that int has super and subscripts while left / > right are different animals ... i looked into this (in the engine) and > decided to delay implementing that (i might do it some day but it's sort of > tricky to keep compatibility) > > also, ints are upright (extensible or stepwise sizes) or slanted (stepwise > sizes) so even if we support something there are some limitations due to > lack of font support (could be dealt with in due time) > > The problem with extensions, like always, in straying from traditional >> TeX is interchangeability of code, or, more importantly, in the >> learning curve obstacles that this introduces to traditional TeX (and >> LaTeX) thinking. I know that at some level we do not care, for we often >> make (good) design choices that improve the syntax of ConTeXt. >> >> Perhaps we can use this thread to discuss other cases (like \sum, ...) >> that present difficulties and then decide on good solutions. >> > > sure ... > > Hans > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE > Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands > tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > ____________________________________________________________ > _______________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to > the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/list > info/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ____________________________________________________________ > _______________________ >