From: luigi scarso <luigi.scarso@gmail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Rendering differences between PDF viewers
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:31:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG5iGsA5m16vYopb2sbujeT7sx9aHSvuvzb1EzCyS4rsUsh8Eg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120417091240.535af1d9@sole.extra.cea.fr>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Alan BRASLAU <alan.braslau@cea.fr> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:54:03 +0200
> Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> wrote:
>
>> (AR might have flaws but so do all other viewers I've seen.)
>
> With one MAJOR difference: for Acrobat reader, one is dependent on the whims and desires of Adobe (and its paying market); the other pdf viewers are open source.
AdobeReader *is* the reference pdf-viewer.
Every pdf for general use should be checked at least with the latest
AdobeReader under windows, which is currently one of the best pdf
viewer.
For the (pdf/lua)TeX community, all the viewer based on xpdf/poppler
are also important, because (pdf/lua)TeX
have a consistent part of code from them, so a bug in xpdf/poppler can
be also a bug in (pdf/lua)Tex.
Other viewers are useful (mupdf which is now 1.0rc1 , sumatra pdf for
windows, just to list a fews)
but not as the previous ones.
--
luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-15 6:00 Kip Warner
2012-04-15 9:07 ` Mojca Miklavec
2012-04-16 23:43 ` Kip Warner
2012-04-15 16:00 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-16 23:44 ` Kip Warner
2012-04-17 6:54 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-17 6:57 ` Kip Warner
2012-04-17 9:53 ` Peter Rolf
2012-04-17 10:12 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-17 10:48 ` Peter Rolf
2012-04-18 0:49 ` Kip Warner
2012-04-18 6:47 ` Martin Schröder
2012-04-18 7:19 ` luigi scarso
2012-04-18 10:58 ` Martin Schröder
2012-04-19 18:26 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-18 22:54 ` Kip Warner
2012-04-18 7:38 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-18 11:12 ` Peter Rolf
2012-04-19 18:25 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-20 7:50 ` Peter Rolf
2012-04-24 12:42 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-24 13:37 ` Peter Rolf
2012-04-25 16:08 ` Peter Rolf
2012-04-24 23:34 ` Kip Warner
2012-04-28 15:52 ` Peter Rolf
2012-04-28 18:25 ` Kip Warner
2012-04-18 22:58 ` Kip Warner
2012-04-18 0:26 ` Kip Warner
2012-04-17 7:12 ` Alan BRASLAU
2012-04-17 7:31 ` luigi scarso [this message]
2012-04-17 7:42 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-17 8:05 ` luigi scarso
2012-04-18 0:24 ` Kip Warner
2012-04-17 18:57 ` Kip Warner
[not found] ` <CAPm68ZimT3cbuhwqTgG+OXXiA_RHaA2snOT05rO-J_iWjodCQA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-18 0:21 ` Kip Warner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAG5iGsA5m16vYopb2sbujeT7sx9aHSvuvzb1EzCyS4rsUsh8Eg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=luigi.scarso@gmail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).