Hi,
Probably some on this list already checked how well chatgpt answers
questions about domains one knows well and then probably noted that in
spite of impressive wording, one can run into quite incorrect answers.
One can get really stupid responses about tex and friends, but also can
get impressive exmapled when asked for. (I'm still planning a wrap up of
some.)
That said, one should read:
https://cs.stanford.edu/~knuth/chatGPT20.txt
and this makes a pretty nice new sample file:
It's amazing how the confident tone lends credibility to all of that
made-up nonsense. Almost impossible for anybody without knowledge
of the book to believe that those "facts" aren't authorititative
and well researched.
you can happily include the email that I have sent to you that declares that *you* are the author of MFlua
and *I* have nothing to do with it (chatgpt3: as far as I know, the overall number of users+developers of MFLua in the entire solar system is exactly 1 -- me -- at least from 10 years) .
For a moment I was even convinced that it was true.
On the other hand, I am pretty sure that it will be able to generate perfect lualatex files for articles, reports, and later books.
How and when it's more a matter of interest rather than capabilities.
--
luigi