From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/94850 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: luigi scarso Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: LaTeX reledmac: what about ConTeXt ? Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 18:45:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1350470528.247163799.1463391842415.JavaMail.root@spooler6-g27.priv.proxad.net> <64f6e404-dd2e-6aa2-315a-8d5d3e40a00c@gmx.es> <0fb5deeb-114b-8f34-9c14-0646f89b81c0@gmx.es> <20160516131433.GC2871403@phare.normalesup.org> <20160516162441.GL2871403@phare.normalesup.org> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2811255450076977700==" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463417218 2187 80.91.229.3 (16 May 2016 16:46:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 16:46:58 +0000 (UTC) To: Mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon May 16 18:46:42 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from zapf.boekplan.nl ([5.39.185.232] helo=zapf.ntg.nl) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b2Let-0001nM-MK for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:46:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7445CCCC0; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:46:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iq7OF76MQyr1; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:46:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE2CCCC4; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:46:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF156CCC1 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:46:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0NydD75971mN for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:46:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com [209.85.217.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1AE2CCC0 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:45:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id n11so52240724lbh.1 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 09:45:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=U6Y9/I379PmpnRaiolyfcyDuduhrP/MLHFnvoyUH7sk=; b=tN0TMC6/3q0Ijm8P8oFyFOE2xrYcU5vMi/Y57/ZafMDsoXR8l0jI4W2QL7PvO0y59a 6/fx/fHebjSs9Y4LbPHz1HRQnsgzB8rF20CQJpqq+mTnlWJurc8EBdRRjjtZaVqR7SVt GyZLA+n6k4bv0qbIoEdfCigRL/PUEYvJ+ZrB25t7Gc3lfQT4AQvkQ/iRyiE1igJzQZtD 0RcVxTGTiP5JamMhGt16nPD1qkOqZuClBqc7N4k7ts+QkpabYnI2ONS4SyrMXGosrkf2 GW2VisghLXgv3rTXROpxAArI+kfJgrYBZxBf4li/UpY+0cq4A9tapOudoxWbBsrazIeR c5Mw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=U6Y9/I379PmpnRaiolyfcyDuduhrP/MLHFnvoyUH7sk=; b=PDq2FmHFsVbm1KWOY/qpBQBkpk8yMaFmD/lKBZMMO/JVvvBM6BWBy9YSaemN7ZYkNW MBjkb+GBhKNHU90yxXnV8E4dX+725y3LPn/TOFvu6VQgFRGtXZmR+ezJWxSHildqv4uK onOaypp0lxWiVfxowgbidcfp9y9W2nkT/beb/nC2t5M6E4wuq0PmwPD8dGjHKGPqcl/W 5jfg/pIWZPDyJJAasEhk4UJDb4f+hMzWdCTR4axefplxA2YB7BBsPCBdD+oF5AlqesJf lqbSSQC/AUh1JvUORijyX0RUHF3r2R5nriCSye7PwdhGb4/pmMNaZvwzx57abmE/qql6 +dEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVzKRdl4aNevixBgHnLEE6goNbkO9MlQgIVAZRmF8vgC6OoXB1p5qRvSZBTa5kcF40CZbV1V5pSNnmwOA== X-Received: by 10.112.133.130 with SMTP id pc2mr9880523lbb.99.1463417148960; Mon, 16 May 2016 09:45:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.86.77 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2016 09:45:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160516162441.GL2871403@phare.normalesup.org> X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: "ntg-context" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:94850 Archived-At: --===============2811255450076977700== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a8272527bfb0532f85ba7 --047d7b3a8272527bfb0532f85ba7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Arthur Reutenauer < arthur.reutenauer@normalesup.org> wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 06:06:49PM +0200, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > > On 05/16/2016 03:14 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: > > > > But does ConTeXt have \la different from \ala because of the Holy > See? > > > > > > See my reply to your earlier email. > > > > I agree with you that classical or ancient vs. modern are misleading > > adjectives when referred to Latin. > > > > In my opinion, etymological or phonetic vs. syllabic should be preferre= d. > > There are two layers, actually (at least in LaTeX; not sure how much > of this is reproduced in ConTeXt): 1. Spelling conventions, 2. Hyphenatio= n. > For the latter, a classification by historical periods clearly makes no > sense, but there is some truth to the fact that an orthography with no > u/v or i/j distinction is closer to the way Latin was written in > classical times (if only very slightly); while using both u and v, and > especially i and j, in contrastive distributions, clearly are modern > conventions -- it would be nice to have a vocabulary for that that > doesn't rely on periods of the evolution of Latin, since those cover > much more than simple differences in spelling. The LaTeX packages > (Babel and Polyglossia) currently have four options, actually: > classical, medieval, modern, and liturgical, such that "classical" will > for example yield "Nouembris" (and all the other ones "Novembris"); > "medieval" uses =C3=A6 and =C5=93 and will thus have "Pr=C3=A6fatio", etc= . > > Best, > > Arthur > > liturgical latin uses =C5=93=CC=81 from 1894 (Missale romanum: en decreto sacrosancti Concilii Tridentini restitutum. https://archive.org/details/missaleromanume01churgoog) It seems the first time it appears. --=20 luigi --047d7b3a8272527bfb0532f85ba7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Arthur Reutenauer &l= t;art= hur.reutenauer@normalesup.org> wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 06:06:49PM +0200, Pablo Rodriguez wro= te:
> On 05/16/2016 03:14 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
> > > But does ConTeXt have \la different from \ala because of the= Holy See?
> >
> > See my reply to your earlier email.
>
> I agree with you that classical or ancient vs. modern are misleading > adjectives when referred to Latin.
>
> In my opinion, etymological or phonetic vs. syllabic should be preferr= ed.

=C2=A0 There are two layers, actually (at least in LaTeX; not sure h= ow much
of this is reproduced in ConTeXt): 1. Spelling conventions, 2. Hyphenation.=
For the latter, a classification by historical periods clearly makes no
sense, but there is some truth to the fact that an orthography with no
u/v or i/j distinction is closer to the way Latin was written in
classical times (if only very slightly); while using both u and v, and
especially i and j, in contrastive distributions, clearly are modern
conventions -- it would be nice to have a vocabulary for that that
doesn't rely on periods of the evolution of Latin, since those cover much more than simple differences in spelling.=C2=A0 The LaTeX packages
(Babel and Polyglossia) currently have four options, actually:
classical, medieval, modern, and liturgical, such that "classical"= ; will
for example yield "Nouembris" (and all the other ones "Novem= bris");
"medieval" uses =C3=A6 and =C5=93 and will thus have "Pr=C3= =A6fatio", etc.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Best,

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Arthur


liturgical latin =C2=A0uses =C5=93=CC=81 from 1894 (Missale romanum= :
en decreto sacrosancti Concilii Tridentini
resti= tutum.=C2=A0
It seems the first time it appears.

=


--
luigi
--047d7b3a8272527bfb0532f85ba7-- --===============2811255450076977700== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KSWYgeW91ciBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcyBvZiBpbnRlcmVz dCB0byBvdGhlcnMgYXMgd2VsbCwgcGxlYXNlIGFkZCBhbiBlbnRyeSB0byB0aGUgV2lraSEKCm1h aWxsaXN0IDogbnRnLWNvbnRleHRAbnRnLm5sIC8gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5udGcubmwvbWFpbG1hbi9s aXN0aW5mby9udGctY29udGV4dAp3ZWJwYWdlICA6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucHJhZ21hLWFkZS5ubCAv IGh0dHA6Ly90ZXguYWFuaGV0Lm5ldAphcmNoaXZlICA6IGh0dHA6Ly9mb3VuZHJ5LnN1cGVsZWMu ZnIvcHJvamVjdHMvY29udGV4dHJldi8Kd2lraSAgICAgOiBodHRwOi8vY29udGV4dGdhcmRlbi5u ZXQKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18= --===============2811255450076977700==--