On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 13:57, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context < ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote: > On 4/2/23 11:19, luigi scarso via ntg-context wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 11:06, Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context > > > wrote: > > > > If you talk about the math font, I do not see what you mean. Daniel > > has worked a lot on his fonts, and they now work well. > > > > > > indeed the body font is not concrete opentype math but it looks very > > similar at first sight > > Hi Luigi, > > according to type-imp-concrete.mkiv, Concrete-Math.otf seems to be only > used for the math font. > > > here evince & mupdf are quite ok (evince somewhat bolder than mupdf), > > Well, evince displays it wrong (this is an already known issue with fake > bold fonts in evince/poppler, reported years ago > [https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/issues/645]). > > hm, 4years ago, quite old... and this is not a fake bold, this is an instance of a variable font. But yes, it seems that evince still has the same problem. -- luigi