From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/69957 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: luigi scarso Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Anyone using dvipdfmx in minimals? Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:34:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310639675 20780 80.91.229.12 (14 Jul 2011 10:34:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:34:35 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Jul 14 12:34:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QhJFU-0000kw-7G for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:34:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A70CAE3B; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:34:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id AEdj12ECUzu7; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:34:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23B3CAE38; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:34:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C2CCAE38 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:34:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id EVRbwtBLUns5 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:34:11 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter5-til.mf.surf.net (filter5-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.221]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EEBCAC8D for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:34:11 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f42.google.com (mail-fx0-f42.google.com [209.85.161.42]) by filter5-til.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p6EAYAgb002875 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:34:10 +0200 Original-Received: by fxe23 with SMTP id 23so722864fxe.15 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 03:34:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=YkQjqqsyZsGKJ9NIJgDQMR4qPO3ZBra6pdH4IiAajRg=; b=XVXZSsx//InBMxDj4vBfSpJ5Dyh5akq2fy+CuyvKF8T8GPOrPlHoAZLkBcEZEviIz4 tItrniMAUdvG+x47L3KKjej91u9Alpu0IfXPY+lC+qbcsBSeT2OcS+AUSdS/wGPF3qH3 hYmRWaIe9Hyin5rt6yA2+vxRdzur1Sf37GSQk= Original-Received: by 10.204.69.196 with SMTP id a4mr818092bkj.109.1310639649735; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 03:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.204.54.17 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 03:34:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=209.85.161.42; country=US; region=CA; city=Mountain View; postalcode=94043; latitude=37.4192; longitude=-122.0574; metrocode=807; areacode=650; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.4192,-122.0574&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0xF7Kyaph - 22d75e4f75b5 - 20110714 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.221 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:69957 Archived-At: On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Dear ConTeXt-ers, > > I'm trying to remember why we are shipping dvipdfmx in ConTeXt: was it > because of Aleph or because of Eastern scripts? I'm not sure if it is > still used or not. I know that it is pretty important in eastern > scripts and as a basis for xdvipdfmx, but I don't know to what extent > ConTeXt supports it and to what extent ConTeXt users are using it if > at all. > > I would only like to know the situation. If people use it, it is no > problem to keep it, but I would at least like to have a rough idea of > its usefulness and usage in ConTeXt. (The dvips program will probably > also be removed; I suspect that it doesn't work at the moment anyway.) xetex ? (I'm not sure , of course) -- luigi ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________