From: "Mikael P. Sundqvist" <mickep@gmail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: position of qed symbol in proofs
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 21:15:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHy-LL-Ps-tq8qvmrd0A82_icDmZzTzPq3cpdc1fZZz0NuT+0w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 616 bytes --]
Hi,
I once used
\defineenumeration[proof][
text=Proof,
closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi,
]
\starttext
\startproof
This is a simple proof.
\stopproof
\startproof
This is another simple proof that ends with a formula
\startformula
1+1=2.
\stopformula
\stopproof
\stoptext
to get the \square at the end of proofs, and it worked out well. But
with the latest beta (and some previous one(s)), the \square is not
placed at the same line as the formula in the second example. Is it
broken? Or is there a new syntax?
PDF with my result is attached.
Best regards, Mikael
[-- Attachment #2: qed.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 10071 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 485 bytes --]
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next reply other threads:[~2014-11-03 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-03 20:15 Mikael P. Sundqvist [this message]
2014-11-08 13:40 ` Mikael P. Sundqvist
2014-11-08 16:43 ` Otared Kavian
2014-11-09 20:29 ` Mikael P. Sundqvist
2014-11-10 5:54 ` Otared Kavian
2014-11-10 9:08 ` Hans Hagen
2014-11-10 9:31 ` Otared Kavian
2014-11-10 9:58 ` Hans Hagen
2014-11-10 10:22 ` Otared Kavian
2014-11-11 13:55 ` Mikael P. Sundqvist
2014-11-11 15:29 ` Hans Hagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHy-LL-Ps-tq8qvmrd0A82_icDmZzTzPq3cpdc1fZZz0NuT+0w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mickep@gmail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).